Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. theSLAYER

    theSLAYER

    Administrator


    • Points

      3

    • Posts

      22526


  2. wwwwwwzx

    wwwwwwzx

    Member


    • Points

      3

    • Posts

      10


  3. Kalaxe

    Kalaxe

    Member


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      116


  4. Kaphotics

    Kaphotics

    Helpful Member


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      7328


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/08/18 in all areas

  1. @Kaphotics I didn't find the exact source code, but I have a reasonable theory now. So basically the level of crabrawler only depends on the pile size. Big pile has 2 level higher crabrawler than the small one. RAM address 0x32DE3208 for berry piles status. + 0x25 is the bit flag for Crabrawler existence + 0x26 is the Crabrawler level + 0x28 is the regular berries table (6 x WORD) Several tests via debugger gives following results: https://github.com/wwwwwwzx/3DSRNGTool/blob/master/Data/BerryTrees.md And compare with the SuMo level range for Crabrawler, they are just the third highest level and the highest level. (For example, SuMo Route 10 level range: 24-27, scripted Crabrawler level is 25 for small pile size, 27 for big size) So I guess they didn't update this with USUM. To summarize, the level of first encounter was scripted inside the SuMo SOS encounter level ranges. But in USUM, they are out of range because the encounter table changes. A solution is adding following static encounter: new EncounterStatic { Species = 739, Level = 25, Location = 106, }, // Route 10 new EncounterStatic { Species = 739, Level = 28, Location = 110, }, // Ula'ula Beach new EncounterStatic { Species = 739, Level = 31, Location = 118, }, // Route 16 new EncounterStatic { Species = 739, Level = 32, Location = 120, }, // Route 17
    2 points
  2. Fixed as a side effect of the latest commit https://github.com/kwsch/PKHeX/commit/05c4a0f286ba3a93c553fb00ffb44d0fa6d9c6bb OT=Satoshi (for chs/cht) currently isn't in the database, will need to be added as another Simulated WC7 @Sabresite
    2 points
  3. oki, although lessangel goes faster than you. I should do the most but as he wants
    1 point
  4. yeah cuz of that lock ppl said mine was hacked so decided not to share anymore cuz all i got was hate comments
    1 point
  5. all right! All the shinys backsprites of s/m are already uploaded> https://mega.nz/#F!NlNyGKqZ!i-QbrdK8qfzebvUJJBpObw PS: Magearna normal, marshadow backsprites are missing because they are the same as normal versions. Minions backsprites are missing all except one because they are all the same. The shellos-east backsprites have been added because they do not exist
    1 point
  6. Hello, first post here to talk a little bit about myself. I am 15 and I'm gonna be 16 in 19 days! I beaten 3 Pokémon games: FireRed, Emerald and Black. I am Argentinian and I'm gonna be glad to help in everything I can!
    1 point
  7. I'll work with Sabresite to get it done, and also update them (since they're discovered to be able to be shiny)
    1 point
  8. Only Crabrawler will have this problem and need more time to find the source. sub_3A3584 (UMv1.2) is the subroutine for random encounter level. It gets called for any wild, including pokemon in dividing peak tunnel and in-battle SOS call. (So Lv 26-29 is still the correct range for ally Crabrawlers) The level of crabrawler first encounter is more like map resources such as berries pile size, and can be SRed as daily events, afaik.
    1 point
  9. jpn サトシ fre Sacha kro 지우 chs/cht Satoshi others Ash
    1 point
  10. For what feels like a slow news week, I have news that is exactly what we need: It was discovered by @wwwwwwzx that due to a programming oversight by USUM development team, it was possible to get a Partner Cap Pikachu to be shiny! (only this variant can experience this) Summary of the process: Step 1: Due to shiny lock, non shiny PID was generated against player's TID/SID, Step 2: then Ash's TID/SID replaces the player's TID/SID on the Cap Pikachu. Meaning, it is possible to get a PID that will be shiny with Ash's TID/SID, as long as your TSV is different from Ash's. Anyhow, here is the Partner cap Pikachu that I managed to obtain shiny using RNG!
    1 point
  11. In light of recent events, I want to reinforce this point to our users: Please do not submit hacks, fakes, custom cards, etc. Maybe you think you're helping the community out: you're not. Maybe you just want a quick laugh; do it elsewhere, preferably not at the expense of our kind users. In any case, I will like to take this opportunity to thank our users who submit self-obtained wonder cards. They are the heroes to everyone interested in event collections (except to hacker-haters, of course ;P )
    1 point
  12. Did you make these? They look like hacks based on Crobat. These are definitely hacks. They fail more than 3 of our tests. We only accept legitimate self-obtained wondercards.
    1 point
  13. Actually, I JUST found a single Christmas Day PCNY Seviper buried among the Pokemon Box Promo PCNY Sevipers, while reorganizing Digiex's compilation save for InsaneNutter. So we can update the list, however more are always more than welcome. Anything PCNY is more than welcome, especially considering how Bulbapedia doesn't even have them all documented.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...