Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

[Kaphotics]

Since when is Orange equivalent to Red?

No issue here.

[Eyedol]

For some reason. all legal Ageto Celebi are showing up as having an Unknown GBA PID.

[Preziise]

I just checked what was my first shiny which was my Numel and it's showing up as "possible method J/K slots don't match encounter".

I chained it near Stark Mountain on my Diamond game and transferred it a long time ago. I just never bothered to check it.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5449549

Edit: actually I'm not positive it was chained as it was a long time ago but there was no cheating involved.

[Hozu]

The 4th gen TID/SID check doesn't seem to be totally accurate.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=4380872

http://i.imgur.com/YfITNsO.png

[dcrispell7]

Just reporting an old problem because I realized something new:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3479053 There is an issue with the encounter slot recognition on Safari Zone pokemon, but, when they evolve:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3479054 the problem goes away and the LA has no issues finding a possible encounter.

[Dark Ray]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=5482588 The German World 2012 Pikachu wondercard doesn't appear to be added to the Pokecheck database, it is available in the onsite event gallery.

[madarauchiha]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=5480217

Is this Ho-Oh legal? Thank you

[evandixon]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=5480217

Is this Ho-Oh legal? Thank you

The Pokemon was deleted so no one can tell. But, this thread is for bug reports in the legality checker. Feel free to make another thread asking about it though (as long as you're not cheating on WiFi or against unsuspecting opponents).

[sloth9230]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5471215

It says characters in nickname are valid, but gen-4 didn't allow lowercase letters.

[Kaphotics]

Gen 4 did allow lowercase nicknames.

[sloth9230]

Gen 4 did allow lowercase nicknames.

Oh wow, I feel dump :bidoof:

[Agonist]

Oh wow, I feel dump :bidoof:

dump

you should.

Anyway, the Searcher Piplup event has yet to be added to the legality analysis, despite being contributed a while ago.

[toirizzle]

Was just checking some pokemon I traded today, and noticed that the date of this Pokemon encounter probably wasn't legit considering the game wasn't even out until 2007.

Screenshot

PokeCheck

[evandixon]

Was just checking some pokemon I traded today, and noticed that the date of this Pokemon encounter probably wasn't legit considering the game wasn't even out until 2007.

Screenshot

PokeCheck

If someone had the date set wrong on the DS, it would still be legal to have a 2007 encounter date.

[theSLAYER]

My Wingull which I captured in SoulSilver (K) is showing:

This Pokémon is not nicknamed but its name doesn't match the species name for its OT's language.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=5579030

[Guest]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3288228

For the Oddish's 3rd gen special move:Hacked / Event only (73)

This should be a legittimate move.

[Hozu]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3288228

For the Oddish's 3rd gen special move:Hacked / >>EVENT ONLY<< (73)

This should be a legittimate move.

There is no way to verify it actually came from the event so...

[Captain Falcon]

Two of my amoonguss has turned up with an "unkown encounter". I think it's to do with them being caught on Route 22. https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5637890 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5637893.

[evandixon]

Two of my amoonguss has turned up with an "unkown encounter". I think it's to do with them being caught on Route 22. https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5637890 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5637893.

It says met at level 47. Serebii says the max level for that route is 45. I don't know if that matters, but maybe that info will help the developers determine if this is in fact a bug.

http://serebii.net/pokedex-bw/location/591.shtml#black2

[Agonist]

I had a similar issue with some I caught on Route 11.

[WhatHappenedToStairs]

It says met at level 47. Serebii says the max level for that route is 45. I don't know if that matters, but maybe that info will help the developers determine if this is in fact a bug.

http://serebii.net/pokedex-bw/location/591.shtml#black2

You can obtain Lv. 47 Amoongus on Route 22 at quantity of two. They're both disguised as items.

I had a similar issue with some I caught on Route 11.

The same thing. Once you acquire Waterfall, you can find two disguised Amoongus at Lv. 47; whereas tall grass Amoonguss are level 41 in that area.

[Agonist]

I'm aware of what causes the issue, and I've already discussed it with Xfr.

[Aggi]

The Pokéwalker Onix shows the move Rock Throw as a Hacked / Event only (88) move in the legality analysis.

[Agonist]

So what?

Anyway: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5652380

The IVs should be marked as red for anything flagged as N's Pokemon, since they're all set 30 IVs.

[Guested]

Hello.

My Blaziken: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5701031

In regards why I'm posting this, under ability it states: ''Invalid or unreleased Dream World ability''

Which I find it quite puzzling since its not ''Invalid'' nor ''Unreleased'' and achieved by breeding two parents I got off Pokecheck, even if hacked (and the legality filter didnt think so) this shouldnt be a issue.

In any case, hope you guys can atleast give me a clarification.

Thank you for your time!

The parents you got off of Pokecheck must be illegal. All Speed Boost Torchics that have been released so far are Dream World event only. Those are always set to male, and since the female is the one that can pass on the hidden ability, it's currently not legally possible to breed a Speed Boost Torchic.

This is not a false positive with Pokecheck. The results are correct.