Kaphotics Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 You aren't giving an example, but you probably did the wrong PID type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vecte Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 You aren't giving an example, but you probably did the wrong PID type. As far as I know, the correct PID type is Uncommon GBA, however, I've tried Uncommon GBA, Common GBA, and all Unrestricted GBA Events(She is not a restricted type). What I think is happening is, being that she is not listed as an event pokemon when she hatches, pokecheck is being thrown off. Here is the current one I've listed: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=345858 Also, I've looked at every Wish Chansey/Blissey I could find, and all show as hacked in Gen 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myzou Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 From what I've seen, the orange font is meant to show a problem with the section it is referring to. However, this image is confusing me. I uploaded my Shiny Sawsbuck I hatched a while back, to see what I should expect to see when I get pokemon from trades, to see what a good one looks like, so I know if the Pokemon I get from trades are hacked/etc. And all came out well... except one: http://i52.tinypic.com/11ttvno.png Is this really a "Problem"? It's flagging as there's a problem simply because I EV trained without Pokerus. I don't have Pokerus on my Generation 5 game yet, so I EV train without it for now. Just wondering if people actually consider that a "legality" issue, even with completely legitimate pokemon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 ^ No that pokemon is fine. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=236833 - Pokecheck should take into consideration that that Blissey should not have Seismic Toss because it's from Sinnoh but it doesn't. It does pick up on the rest of the problems though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linksage Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 Mr. Nido is not public, so we can't see what the error is. Please report any pokémon either incorrectly reported as hacked or new ideas to detect currently undetected hacks.Always include a link to the incriminated pokémon if you can. You don't have to make it public. I knew the pokemon was legit, so I wasn't really looking for outside opinions on the matter. I was just pointing out the discrepancy for the coder; it's since been fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ju-da-su Posted August 24, 2011 Share Posted August 24, 2011 I don't know if this is acceptable or not, but I'd really like someone to fix this up, since this actually makes me no longer want to trust the legality check of PokeCheck. Firstly, I'm an event collector, especially of DW events. I obtained 4 serial code DW events myself (Bulbasaur, Treeko, Mamoswine and Porygon) using legit serial code numbers in my Japanese BW. I at first believe PokeCheck can at least screen the hacked DW events, as in, Pokesav'd DW events, for me at least, since I can understand if it can't pick up PokeStock Editted ones, though I did a little testing myself and was disappointed with what I found. Basically, what I did, was I took this female DW Pidgey, legitly from DW, and was trying to Pokesav'd it into Flawless Adamant male DW (Solar Power) Lv.10 UT Charmander with Charmander's Japanese name (not nicknamed) and everything that will make it looks like a good RNG'd DW Charmander. The result I got, was this, which, yeah, no difference from legit DW pokemon at all even while it's actually Pokesav'd. Just want to point this out. I'm aware that PID and IV determinants changed in this generation, but seriously, if the legality checker can't even pick up that the pokemon just completely got Pokesav'd into another new whole species, then I don't think this checker is at all trustworthy, for me at least. The fact that it kinda show that all amateur hacker needs to sav'd one completely undetectable DW event are a little knowledge of what legit DW event looks like and one rubbish DW pokemon (and for more advanced hacker, probably just any fodder and some knowledge of what to change in the PID to make it DW) kinda gets on the nerve of someone who wants to collect legit pokemons like me. As I said, if it's Pokestock Editted, then it's completely understandable that the checker won't going to catch that, but if even the Pokesav'd pokes can get pass the legality check, then I don't think this checker is that reliable after all. Hope someone can work something out to fix that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted August 24, 2011 Share Posted August 24, 2011 There's nothing needing to be fixed, you hacked something that is undetectable because it is exactly like one you can get from the game. Hence why this is a Legality checker. It's not mine, it's Tsanth's! It was made in the DPPt era so it's not really accurate for 5th gen originated mons. Just less restrictive than the pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horus16 Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Deoxys in Emerald have Pursuit and is legal but in Legality Analysis is Hacked / Event only (228) http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=379540 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casty Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 The Legality Checker doesn't seem to detect DW Pokemon that are available only in Japan, marking Pokemon like this as completely legit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Adding in DW exclusives is tedious to update. It shouldn't be hard to look up if DW Squirtle has been released in the US Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casty Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I see, thanks for the feedback. I have another question, I checked the legality of my old Pearl Gengar just for kicks and this popped out: I was like what the hell, the Gengar I hatched all those years ago (way before I even touched RNG abuse) is marked as hacked? What are DPPt hatch trash bytes anyway? I know that some of my Pokemon have them removed by a name rater. Could a combination of name rater + B/W cuss filter cause this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 Name rater, that's what it is. Pokemon would hatch with trash bytes, if you nicknamed them they would be removed. There's no problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoshiOG1 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 About DW abilities: I made a Dream World Raikou with the ability Volt Absorb using Pokesav AND Pokegen (i used Pokegen so i could put it in a Dream Ball). But, the legality analysis says that the ability is 100% hacked, as if it doesn't recognize it as a DW ability. (Trust me, I've seen legit DW Pokemon, and it said, that their DW abilities were Valid.) Is this a glitch? Or is it because Raikou's Dream World ability hasn't been defined on the legality analysis? P.S. Pokegen seems to force Pokemon to be "Nicknamed". D:< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guested Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 I made a Dream World Raikou with the ability Volt Absorb using Pokesav AND Pokegen (i used Pokegen so i could put it in a Dream Ball). But, the legality analysis says that the ability is 100% hacked Seems it's working just fine to me. Your Pokemon IS 100% hacked. Raikou with its hidden ability has never been released, so there's no reason for that pokemon+ability combo to be in the checker. P.S. Pokegen seems to force Pokemon to be "Nicknamed". D:< Are you using the latest version of Pokegen? That issue was fixed some time ago.using Pokesav AND Pokegen You probably shouldn't be using Pokesav at all. And by "probably," I mean "definitely." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoshiOG1 Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Well, maybe I prefer Pokesav because to me, Pokegen is only good for putting Pokemon in Dream Balls. And why is everybody against Pokesav? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guested Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Well, especiall if you are using one of the translated versions, Pokesav is extremely buggy and even incorrect sometimes. Pokegen is vastly superior and can handle more things in the pkm editing anyway. And all of the translations are correct, which isn't really something you can say for Pokesav, cause I think they're still using crappy translations instead of data from the Eng game in some of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codemonkey85 Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 I did quite a bit of research back in my hacking heyday and found Pokesav's methods for determining certain properties of the .SAV files to be inaccurate. Furthermore, I have reason to believe COM outsourced all of his information without doing any fact-checking. And honestly, Pokesav's GUI is atrocious. It was a good start to a new generation of Pokémon hacking, but... I mean, does anyone use AOL anymore? How about Windows ME? EDIT: Better stay on topic. I just want to say I am very, very impressed with this web service. I tried it out the other day and the Pokémon transfers were easy and painless. Keep up the good work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finner Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 (edited) Today i found an interesting Pokecheck glitch. I downloaded an obviously hacked Bulbasaur, take a look at it - here Although relic crowns are supposed to be taken away during download, this one stayed. EDIT: If that link doesn't work try this one: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=218214 Edited September 5, 2011 by Finner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxSkedz24xx Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I think that event exclusive moves shouldn't be grouped with hacked moves. The legality checker should take into account the other circumstances involved with event-exclusive moves, eg. Wish on Chansey/Blissey: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=400345 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I think that event exclusive moves shouldn't be grouped with hacked moves. The legality checker should take into account the other circumstances involved with event-exclusive moves, eg. Wish on Chansey/Blissey: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=400345 Wrong PID type, so it's not even legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxSkedz24xx Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 (edited) Girafarig's Dream World ability, Sap Sipper, has been released, yet Pokecheck shows it as hacked. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=416438 Link for proof of release: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pleasant_Forest_%28Dream_World_area%29 I have another mistake, this time with some Egg Moves: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=416899 Smeargle can Sketch both and breed to Delibird. Edited September 8, 2011 by xxSkedz24xx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuber Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 (edited) http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=137792 So today I was looking at my VGC Pokémon I used in the UK qualifiers to use them in this Japan cup (Mostly so I have some reference to remember which move is which when playing with them on a Japanese game lol).. but I noticed this now has an invalid PID, when it didn't before... o-o; So I was wondering what's changed in the past few months in terms of PID discoverys? Edit: Oops.. I just deleted the Pokémon forgetting I put that link here last night. x-x; Edited September 9, 2011 by Cuber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bond697 Posted September 9, 2011 Share Posted September 9, 2011 i showed pokecheck how to check a lot of pids, but i don't think he realizes that the roamers aren't generated like wild pokemon. i should probably tell him... or if someone else could tell him since i'm lazy? that would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXEC_HARMONIOUS/. Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 I've noticed that being nicknamed with any species name is considered hacked by Pokecheck, not just the species name of the Pokemon being checked. Case in point: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=430812 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxSkedz24xx Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 On this Wormadam I RNG'd on my HeartGold (because I'm a boss like that and RNG on HeartGold, not Diamond), 3, that's right, 3, of its moves are coming up as hacked. I posted the link in the shoutbox and received multiple affirmations that it is legit. Please fix this problem ASAP: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=435979 Also, proof that the moves in question are legal: http://www.psypokes.com/dex/psydex/413_trash/learnsets/bw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now