Jump to content

pokemonfan

Member
  • Posts

    1167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pokemonfan

  1. <p><p><p><p><p>Yeah, I still have to do that wraith89.</p></p></p></p></p>

  2. <p><p><p><p><p>Yeah, I still have to do that wraith89.</p></p></p></p></p>

  3. Ok, I do realize though that my whole argument has been based on my preference and not really backing up everything. I dont take it to offense.
  4. <p><p><p><p><p>Good I guess...</p></p></p></p></p>

  5. <p><p><p><p><p>Good I guess...</p></p></p></p></p>

  6. Zelda is nothing like mewtwo I'm not sure where you are getting that. However, lucario learns aura sphere at level 37. Mewtwo learns it at level 100. I'd prefer lucario because 1. The type of fight plus move type of fight gives it a total of 135 damage with total accuracy 2. He learns it earlier so it can be used to advantage earlier 3. Mewtwo is a lot harder to get so easier access to aura sphere with lucario. Although I would love to get my paws on a mewtwo.
  7. I guess you have a point there. Yeah, I've read that part. I'd say I was insulted but your correct. I really dont know that much about competitive battling. That is because I really dont battle competitively. Also, this thread I guess has been going in the direction on whose better when evidently no one will win because really no one is better. Plus there is no way a die hard water supporter is going to sway a die hard fire supporter or a fire supporter sway a water supporter. So the argument losing its point. Additionally, although you were angered with my question, enkidu, I'm glad you did name some. Also, I see that you have a point there those were more of a defensive fire types. Perhaps all this classification with water being defensive and fire being offensive is just a stereotype I think that is kind of evident now, and what I've learned from this thread so far.
  8. shiny floon! Wow!
  9. Interesting. Not only the numbers, but the fact that you monitored them.
  10. A water and fire type? That just sounds impossible. Anyway, I guess you may be right on the garchomp thing but I'm not to sure. I think that a decent water type could bring him down. As for the conspiracy with the electric types I think you are definitely wrong there. I just dont know. I still say water, I mean you cant even dream of a fire type bringing down a garchomp.
  11. ?Cant a water type counter garchomp with a move like surf?
  12. LOL wraith89. Yeah, I hate pikachu's speed. I'm usually the pokemon trainer now and my friend loves to be pikachu so guess who ends up losing. Me, I'm always out speeded and the only chance I have is squirtle who isn't my fave. Ivysaur is now and I adore charizard's power and stamina but squirtle with low stamina, attack power, and just high speed is quite annoying! Pikachu even beat my best character, zelda! I think maybe he is uber but why so bias towards raichu?
  13. Yeah, well the name some Enkidu. That would be nice. Are they decent ones? I mean some of the best water types, in my opinion, are starters I really dont like the other water pokemon in the games (with the exception of poliwhirl I love him and vaporeon) I just see water types as well more defensive because of their more bulky evolutions. I dont think cyndaquil puts on that much weight..and neither does chimchar and ponyta doesn't get that much bigger, magby grows but steadily there isn't a huge leap like from wooper to quagsire or marshtomp to swampert. Plus, when considering the legendaries I think kyogre suicoone, and palkia have a large advantage over the other legendaries. Plus, Kyogre has always been somewhat like my favorite legendary. Kyogre (drizzle ability) suicoone (covers grass weakness with ice moves) and palkia (water + dragon type=a high resistance to most types. Although, I'm quite bias to water types I realize the fire type advantages. Next time I play a generation IV game I will pick chimchar because I've grown somewhat tired of the constant water choosing with all of my generation IV games. Plus, in firered I chose charmander because charizard is awesome but I still think water types are better. Plus blastoise did not strike my fancy so I did not choose squirtle. I was very close to choosing bulbasaur though.
  14. I hope everyone realizes that shiny pokemon only look different and dont have any different like stats. If I'm wrong please correct me. Although I do love shinies!
  15. agreed sabocan. It does look good. I dont know what the people are talking about with the darker stuff. This skin is just fine.
  16. Maybe not till much later. The best way to attract people to our site is by having more information! The more efficient we are the more times we are going to come up on google searches for pokemon. At least that is what I've noticed. I click on the first one because it usually has the best information whenever I do a search. So if we can get on top or 3rd/4th on the first page in a typical google search we might become bigger then serrebii and bulbapedia who are like almost always on the first page.
  17. Below Pichu! Wow, no offense but I always thought that Pichu sucked. It hurt itself with every move it made. Recently, I tried battling with mewtwo and it was just to slow for me.
  18. Interesting, a both plus and minus sign, did you see this with any of the other stats? I would say it is the result of ev training though.
  19. Oops, I forgot about the hydro cannon downside. I also, know the other side if it was sunny, ability blaze was activated, and blastburn was used. However, I highly doubt that a fire pokemon can survive a decent surf. Water types rule and I'm surprised fire has the lead as of this post. Fire pokemon, usually, have the same basic concept, hit and die. It is hard for a fire type to maintain either a good defense or special defense stat if it is battling with the purpose of a higher atk or sp. atk stat. So then, if they do hit first and their foe survives, well then they perish. I'm just making a point, if fire types are so good, how come they usually have the same flaw filled tactic? I mean, blazikan and infernape are excellent examples in the speed + a higher atk stat= enemy KO. Water pokemon can survive those hits so clearly fire types have a flaw right there.
  20. Charmander!
  21. Welcome to project pokemon forums. I like the name. Paradox, I've always liked that word.
  22. Yeah, I would like some water defenders. When it comes to surviving surf, you know, it isn't the top water move. Hydro pump is the normal one but then hydro cannon comes in with more power and accuracy makes it the top of water moves. Plus with a rain dance on, torrent up high because of low HP makes a pokemon knowing this unstoppable practically. I'd like to see a fire type survive that. I've always liked the move dragon rage ok. So I'm a little bias when it comes to the move's efficiency.
  23. It is too weak to water! BTW dragon rage is consistant that is why i like it. Consistency so you know that it will always work 40 HP damage and you dont have to worry about type advantages. I also made a typo, it should be swampert.
  24. Hooray! I'm astounded by the growth as well. I definitely that this site can possibly become bigger then the current top fan sites.
  25. Welcome to project pokemon. Do you like drifloon? Your story with blastoise, that is astonishing and quite hard to believe yet, I believe you.
×
×
  • Create New...