wraith89
-
Posts
3519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Pokédex
Portal
Technical Documentation
Pages
Tutorials
Forums
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by wraith89
-
<p><p><p><p><p>What are those? I had no idea Fawful had other appearances o_O</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Pretty cool. So how's life?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>What are those? I had no idea Fawful had other appearances o_O</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Pretty cool. So how's life?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
Not if you're good with switching... of course, Rotom hates Pursuit, but still, Specs set can hurt. However I don't see the general strategy in his team though.
-
No they don't. Not many people care about that. There's a reason why they hold choice items. You may not like the fact it locks you into one move, but choice items can prove dangerous and effective provided they're used correctly. I've seen teams with 6 choice users that was able to defeat the other person. There are quite effective ways to utilize Choice items, and Porygon-Z with Specs is VERY dangerous. A Rotom can use Trick to trickspecs a unsuspecting physical sweeper anyways. I'm not a big fan of choice users, but still, my Specsmence has proven quite dangerous in many times and has hit really hard.
-
<p><p><p><p><p>What's up Fawful? That villain from Mario and Luigi Superstar Saga? Awesome <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/tongue.png" alt=":P" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/tongue@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" /></p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>What's up Fawful? That villain from Mario and Luigi Superstar Saga? Awesome <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/tongue.png" alt=":P" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/tongue@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" /></p></p></p></p></p>
-
I think I need to make a new rule about double posting :-/ Some beautiful guitar music from Liona Boyd.
-
What is the hardest pokemon to capture??
wraith89 replied to dragonmaster005's topic in Generation 4
Regirock took me one Ultra Ball o_O And so did Registeel. Regice gave me troubles though. -
<p><p><p><p><p>Working just fine I guess... but Ryu's complaining about hax as usual >.></p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Working just fine I guess... but Ryu's complaining about hax as usual >.></p></p></p></p></p>
-
Which is why my team is better (sees first post)
-
Hmmm, it's funny how none of the Gospels mention the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. "And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. " ~ Luke 21:5-6 This prediction from Jesus came true at 70 A.D. when the temple in Jerusalem was sacked by the Romans. Don't you think the disciples would have written about this prediction coming true if the Gospels were written at that time? With many people against them, they'd need to back their assertion about Christ being the Messiah by affirming that. Even the book of Acts, which is a sequel to Luke, seems to not mention anything about that either. And Acts is a book filled with historical events regarding the early Christian church. Now why wouldn't something as important as the sacking of the Jewish temple be included then? This suggests the Gospels were written earlier (and we all know the Pauline Epistles came before the Gospels). "But after two years Porcius Festus came into Felix' room: and Felix, willing to shew the Jews a pleasure, left Paul bound." Acts 24:27 Festus was not appointed as a procurator until around A.D. 55-59. And since the Gospel of Luke was written before Acts, and we all know that Mark was the earliest one, you'd think the Gospels were written much earlier than A.D. 70. The suspect Gospel, John, though, may have been written quite late, but it doesn't mention the sacking of the Jewish temple either. As for me I think the Gospels must have been written earlier, MUCH earlier than A.D. 140 (where did you get THAT number from?)
-
dragonmaster, you can easily put sprites by using [noparse][sprite]Pokedex number[/sprite][/noparse] tags or [noparse][sprite]Pokedex number[/sprite][/noparse]. An example? Putting 001 in the sprite tag will give you Bulbasaur... [sprite]001[/sprite]. Another dream team... [sprite]186[/sprite] [sprite]186[/sprite] [sprite]186[/sprite] [sprite]186[/sprite] [sprite]186[/sprite] [shinysprite]186[/shinysprite] I'd love to make a team of Politoeds work
-
Why don't you just try to get one from the GTS then? I got one from there... but it was named "BUTT MUNCH". GRRRR... I don't know. Some people are lucky, other people are not. Look at me. All I've found were a bunch of Silcoons and a single hermaphrodite Burmy (a male Burmy that evolved into Wormadam... yeah, don't ask... I screwed something up and...)
-
Silcoon, Silcoon, and more Silcoon. Oh, did I mention Silcoon? Seriously, I found nothing from honey trees but Silcoon. Where did I get Heracross then? It's all thanks to Ray, who traded one to me
-
If ONLY I had my Gyarados, things would be different... if ONLY
-
It's fine. Just don't do it again
-
No, crit would have gotten me anyways... as you can see. Once 6 CMs were in-tact, I was sure it'd be over. Lady Fortuna has no good feelings about me, so... >.> And why was Clefable in there? It was supposed to be Gyarados... whoops. Ha ha. Oh well. And it seems like you broke the first rule: http://projectpokemon.org/forums/showthread.php?t=949
-
Granted but it slowed down the game very much... I wish Farfetch'd would evolve