xfr Posted May 11, 2011 Author Posted May 11, 2011 I'm surprised about your egg axew. Is it normal it has a trash byte and nickname or did you made it so because the legality checker doesn't accept eggs?
cH053n Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 (edited) The Axew egg is untouched after I got it from the Mystery Gift NPC. Any egg you load up in to Pokegen will show it nicknamed as Egg with the trash byte sequence since the nickname Egg is shorter than the pokemon's actual name A Pidove egg would look like this Egg\FFFFve\FFFF\0000\0000\0000\FFFF A Pansage egg would look like this Egg\FFFFage\FFFF\0000\0000\FFFF all with the nickname flag checked and here is the Haxorus still showing errors http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=75650 ► Locations Fateful but not from an event. Egg receive location is invalid. Edited May 11, 2011 by cH053n more info
xfr Posted May 11, 2011 Author Posted May 11, 2011 Please let there be no more egg events, they are nightmares to check
cH053n Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 lol, thanks for your hard work People will appreciate this a lot! Maybe you should add a Paypal donate button somewhere? heh
Guested Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Maybe he should add a paypal button after he gets things straight. Why do you think Mystery Gift and wireless distros are exclusive? There are three types of Mystery Gift but they differ only by transmission method. The data sent to the game doesnt change based on how it was sent. Wireless, Wi-fi, and IR Mystery Gifts would all produce the same results. As for Victini... it is by IR distribution at participating stores when you prove you pre ordered the movie ticket by showing a voucher. I hate to be the negative guy here, but I highly suggest you all continue to report these numerous errors. This works better as a group project since the creator doesnt fully know his stuff. I also suggest that no one trust this tool too much until it is sorted out better. I further suggest that no one ever trust bulbapedia.
ReignOfComputer Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 What is "GTS Metadata", and how is it checked? Thanks.
cH053n Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 What is "GTS Metadata", and how is it checked? Thanks. When you upload a pokemon directly by connecting to the fakeGTS it will collect your Metadata. It tracks your OT name, ID, avatar, and real world location. Basically what shows in the Unity Tower... I think.
cH053n Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 The new clone status feature is neat, one thing I noticed though On some of my pokemon that are public it says "including time(s) as a public pokémon." its missing the number of times it appears as public. and its kind of annoying to see all my pokemon are cloned... lol whatever, its gonna happen either way. Thanks for cleaning up those bad hacks earlier.
Linoone Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 DW Poliwag comes with Swift Swim, if evolved into Politoed this ability naturally changes to Drizzle. Everything under the legality checker comes out valid except for the ability (which states Hacked, despite all DW Politoeds having Drizzle).
Miao Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 I just gotta say... zomg that's my Petilil A friend just linked me here to tell me. Keep up the good work!
cH053n Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 DW Poliwag comes with Swift Swim, if evolved into Politoed this ability naturally changes to Drizzle. Everything under the legality checker comes out valid except for the ability (which states Hacked, despite all DW Politoeds having Drizzle). Hmm and my hacked Politoed appears to be valid... lol http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=72776
xfr Posted May 12, 2011 Author Posted May 12, 2011 Can you link to the faulty pokémon, Linoone? I suppose the problem is not the dream ability but the fact that your pokemon is lacking the HasDWAbility flag. In the stats report does it say Ability: Drizzle (DW) or just Ability: Dizzle? If it's the latter your pokémon is hacked.
Scotteh Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Apologies, but could someone here point me in the right direction of information regarding the terminator sequence in trash bytes in the Pokémon's name?
xfr Posted May 12, 2011 Author Posted May 12, 2011 cH053n's thrad on terminator sequences is probably a good start.
cH053n Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 My thread covers Gen V Trash Bytes in Gev IV were a lot different, basically if the Pokemon was Pal Parked or Hatched without a nickname then it needs trash bytes. Where as event pokemon have an all \FFFF\ escape sequence. More info here - http://projectpokemon.org/wiki/Trash_Bytes
cH053n Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 I'm not sure if this is a bug with your legality analysis or pokegen. Basically right now in Pokegen trash bytes left over after evolution or nicknaming a pokemon show up as actual characters. Like the example in my thread showing Raggenrola Roggenrola Boldore\FFFFla Gigalith\FFFFa It returns this error on your legality analysis ► Nickname Boldore\xFFFF\x6C00\x6100\x0000 All characters in name are valid. Invalid terminator sequence in trash bytes. it could be due to the original name of Roggenrola being the full 10 characters and ending with \FFFF but then it can't end with that after it evolves... http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=79069
xfr Posted May 13, 2011 Author Posted May 13, 2011 This is not the problem. Pokécheck is complaining because you are missing the last terminator \FFFF which to my knowledge is present in all gen 5 nicknames at the end of the field. If you change it to Boldore\xFFFF\x6C00\x6100\xFFFF it should be fine, like this: http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?pk=6213
cH053n Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 (edited) OK, ya Pokegen doesn't automatically add a terminator at the end if the name is full length and ends with trash bytes. Had to manually add it... Normally with a name like Roggenrola you don't have to add a terminator at the end, it would automatically do it when saving it to .pkm Edited May 13, 2011 by cH053n
cH053n Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 I dont understand the error for this one, says I have invalid characters in the OT name and nickname. I use the same OT name in other pokemon, and use the same type of characters for others nicknames as well. http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=79466 and normally it doesn't check for non-Latin characters EDIT: nevermind, I found out what the error was. I had language set to English, when I should have set it to Japanese...
cH053n Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 Gen IV pokemon that are uploaded can not have their legality to be checked by the user that uploaded it unless the pokemon is public. The output window shows "Access not allowed"
xfr Posted May 13, 2011 Author Posted May 13, 2011 Damn, it has been wrong for ages but nobody ever reported it. Thanks.
cH053n Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 what timezone is the site in? date added seems to be a day ahead from when I upload mid day
xfr Posted May 13, 2011 Author Posted May 13, 2011 It uses CET/CEST but it would probably make sense to use PST/PDT with two thirds of users from the US and 20% of them from California.
cH053n Posted May 14, 2011 Posted May 14, 2011 Gen III and IV pokemon have their name in all CAPS if it is not nicknamed, this is not detected in the legality analysis. Gen IV Gengar Name should appear as GENGAR if not nicknamed This pokemon - http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=81538 name has upper / lowercase letters and does not have nickname checked but reads as valid in the legality analysis. Pretty minor but thought I'd point it out.
cH053n Posted May 14, 2011 Posted May 14, 2011 If the pokemon is hacked without an ability, "Unknown", it passes the legality analysis.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now