Leaderboard

Break it down into smaller questions. 1. Is the encounter the Pokémon originated from subject to any RNG correlation or pattern? 2. Did the encounter get generated with the correct pattern straight from the database? 3. Is the correlation possible to calculate in near-realtime? 4. Is the correlation calculation implemented in the program? Good luck answering all for every encounter available in the games.

My message was intended to be a thought exercise for whoever wanted to investigate it. The attachment is illegal, it only learns Thunder via TM yet it doesn't have the TM flag checked. Regular wild Pokémon in SV do not have any RNG correlation because they use the csprng.

Read the last point. There’s too much encounter scenarios to reply for every single one of them. You’re gonna need to figure them out for yourselves based on the mons in question (if/when you encounter them)

Thanks, resolved on latest. B2F does indeed have a separate fishing slot reference https://github.com/pret/pokecrystal/blob/6180be355ed1343e99f9682e8869abb7d8839e76/data/maps/maps.asm#L115-L117 SID=0 fixed, no longer shows Fishy. The Fishy RNG is because it never was fully implemented for every encounter type; Cute Charm compounds the weirdness.

If they took the time and effort to hack somewhat competently, no. And for RNG, you more or less can’t see them without being able to view the data. Anyhow, even if they didn’t hack competently, well, even so, you won’t really be able to without access to viewing the team’s summary. if you could view the team’s summary, at least *maybe* a few things will pop out, like multiple a Gen 9 Pokémon being caught on the same date with all perfect IVs (you’ll need the IV judge for that), and maybe a bunch of shinies on the same date even if they aren’t flawless in stats. Maybe they weren’t caught in the correct location. It’s not gonna be easy for players with access to the data, and even in situations that people has access to the data (like event staff), they may not know what to check. Anyhow, I believe RNG manipulations isn’t the problem that was highlighted (also I wasn’t answering to that either), but rather it was bad hacks that didn’t take legitimate RNG sequences into account, hence giving a concrete reason to show they were hacked.