Khift Posted June 7, 2011 Posted June 7, 2011 Found another false positive: Giratina holding a Griseous Orb becomes Giratina-O, gaining Levitate as it's ability, but the legality checker declares the ability is hacked because it isn't part of it's normal dex entry. Example: http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=148819 Edit: Shaymin-S is the only other pokemon I can find that has a different ability while in an alternate form. It's not based on a held item like Giratina's is, but it'll probably hit the same false positive.
xfr Posted June 7, 2011 Author Posted June 7, 2011 Alternate forms like Skymin or Giratina-O are not supported yet. The form exclusive moves/abilities/stats are not recognized.
Khift Posted June 7, 2011 Posted June 7, 2011 Alternate forms like Skymin or Giratina-O are not supported yet. The form exclusive moves/abilities/stats are not recognized.Gotcha, so it's something you're already aware of then. Carry on, carry on, as if nothing really mattered...
Vixana Posted June 7, 2011 Posted June 7, 2011 I have a couple of false negatives to report. http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=129540, A level 2 rilou in a masterball. http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=129537, A level 5 treeko in a masterball. Neither of these are in the wild at those levels, therefore they cannot be in masterballs. Infact, treeko don't even exist in the wild. I know, you're going to say, "What about the dream world?" If they were from the dream world, they would 1. Have dream world abilites. 2. Not be shiny. 3. Be level 10 or higher.
xfr Posted June 7, 2011 Author Posted June 7, 2011 (edited) Those were probably obtained by action replay modifier. They are not recognized as hacked because there are no encounter (location+level) checks for generation 4, and since the catch location AND encounter level are deleted during transfer to gen 5 it is very difficult to check previous gen encounters without making many legitimate events or special cases illegal, like all the pokémon ranch stuff. In other news I fixed Giratina-O and Skymin (the stats, abilities and moves, not the sprites). Edited June 7, 2011 by xfr
Slashmolder Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 Out of curiosity I thought I'd check out my pokemon and I'm getting "Default strain (might be from hacked pokérus)" for my pokemon when I know I obtained it legitimately. My username on the site is slash. I got pokerus randomly on Black from some wild pokemon which I killed and have spread it to all my other pokemon. I also find it odd that I get told "Pokémon is likely edited or RNG abused." when I RNG abused other pokemon and didn't get that message.
Tedster Posted June 15, 2011 Posted June 15, 2011 http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?pk=167846 Just a thingie I was looking at when checking for something I just traded for (a grimer). It says: "Nickname ベトベター\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\x5811\x0C02\xFFFF This pokémon is not nicknamed but its name doesn't match the species name for its OT's language. " Went on the usual sites and checked its name and it's ベトベター there as well. Just thought I'd go ahead and post about it.
xfr Posted June 15, 2011 Author Posted June 15, 2011 Thanks for reporting the problem. I already know the "ー" is at fault but I'm waiting for confirmation by Guested to be sure your pokémon has the correct transfered name or if all poketransfer programs are wrong.
Kaphotics Posted June 15, 2011 Posted June 15, 2011 Out of curiosity I thought I'd check out my pokemon and I'm getting "Default strain (might be from hacked pokérus)" for my pokemon when I know I obtained it legitimately.My username on the site is slash. I got pokerus randomly on Black from some wild pokemon which I killed and have spread it to all my other pokemon. I also find it odd that I get told "Pokémon is likely edited or RNG abused." when I RNG abused other pokemon and didn't get that message. The default strain can still be infectious to other Pokemon. It's only saying that it got infected from Gen 4 Pokerus, or it was hacked on and then spread.
kryptonite Posted June 17, 2011 Posted June 17, 2011 My Carracosta has an "unknown encounter" (it's from Nacrene City). This could be a problem with fossils... Also, I have a question regarding Gen 5 PIDs... I believe last time I checked some of my pokes they were alright, but now they say Invalid... It's all my JP pokemon from JP White.
Kaphotics Posted June 17, 2011 Posted June 17, 2011 My Carracosta has an "unknown encounter" (it's from Nacrene City). This could be a problem with fossils...Also, I have a question regarding Gen 5 PIDs... I believe last time I checked some of my pokes they were alright, but now they say Invalid... It's all my JP pokemon from JP White. Post links to them please
xfr Posted June 18, 2011 Author Posted June 18, 2011 You're right abotu fossils, I broke their encounter check by accident but it should be fine now. I don't know about the PID problem for your white version, I need links to check them.
kryptonite Posted June 18, 2011 Posted June 18, 2011 http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=118974 Here's one... I can go get some more. EDIT: The ones I just sent are okay... That's strange. >_>; http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=175477
xfr Posted June 19, 2011 Author Posted June 19, 2011 After discussing your problem with Bond697, we reached the conclusion that your PID must have been altered somehow. Did you catch those pokémon yourself or did you trade them? Were you using an action replay when catching them?
kryptonite Posted June 19, 2011 Posted June 19, 2011 I caught them, but used Pokegen's PID generator to change the PID because at the time natures were said to be related to PID still... I thought my Stoutland was unaltered since it happened to have an okay nature but I guess I was wrong... But on a related note, the checker does not like eggs transferred between regions (and nicknamed)... o_0 http://pokecheck.kraftpaper.org/?p=detail&uid=175598
xfr Posted June 19, 2011 Author Posted June 19, 2011 Pokécheck is right again. Please only report pokémon which you know are legit and show up as hacked - if you know it's hacked then don't be surprised if pokécheck tells you it's hacked.
kryptonite Posted June 19, 2011 Posted June 19, 2011 That Rotom I know is legit... I sent the egg from my US Black to my JP White and hatched it there...
xfr Posted June 19, 2011 Author Posted June 19, 2011 My mistake, you're right. Trading eggs works except to japanese and corean games, because I'm missing the character table used for nicknames in those versions. The problem will be fixed once I find screenshot of all the character tables in jp/kr versions of the game and add them.
Aarux Posted June 20, 2011 Posted June 20, 2011 What does the message "Invalid egg receive date." mean? An RNG'ed Feebas from a trade said that, as well as a Houndour I RNG bred myself. Does it have to do with dates in the future? Both of them had future dates (April 23, 2013 and June 25, 2011 respectively).
xfr Posted June 20, 2011 Author Posted June 20, 2011 You get this warning when one of the encounter date is in the future or before B/W release, or when an egg was hatched before it was obtained from the daycare. Most of the time this warning is not a bad thing as it is typically found on RNG abused pokémon.
maison123 Posted June 21, 2011 Posted June 21, 2011 It seems that I got everything right here but I still got an error 13266... Can anyone tell me what my problem is ?
xfr Posted June 21, 2011 Author Posted June 21, 2011 I don't understand your problem - you get error 13266 when a pokémon is successfully recorded on Pokécheck, this does not indicate an error.
maison123 Posted June 21, 2011 Posted June 21, 2011 It's okay now ! Sorry for all the trouble ! It works fine on the official gts.
Fishaman P Posted June 22, 2011 Posted June 22, 2011 Yeah... A Level 100 Porygon-Z just failed the check because Tri-Attack was detected as a hacked move. In Gen V. P.S. It learns it at 51.
Fishaman P Posted June 22, 2011 Posted June 22, 2011 A Starmie just passed with these seemingly contradictory notes: Starmie\xFFFF\x0200\x0000\xFFFF This Pokémon was evolved after being transfered to gen 5. Found valid gen 4 trash bytes from original name "STARMIE".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now