Zidshinsin Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 My breloom's Technician ability and Bullet Seed were marked illegal, although they are both legal (Technician is a Hidden Ability, Bullet Seed can be learned through breeding.) Focus Punch is also marked "illegal" on it, even though it can also learn that move through breeding: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=6795088 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 My breloom's Technician ability and Bullet Seed were marked illegal, although they are both legal (Technician is a Hidden Ability, Bullet Seed can be learned through breeding.) Focus Punch is also marked "illegal" on it, even though it can also learn that move through breeding: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=6795088 The Pokémon in question no longer exists, but if it's what I think it is, the legality analysis is working as intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=30822 Unless I'm missing something, this shouldn't be having issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaprasHunterAnonymous Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 (edited) I checked this Rayquaza a few levels ago and now at lvl 56 it's saying the PID is "hacked (valid spreads: 30/30/25/5/2/17, 4/0/16/26/1/0)". With the time I spent finding it, and the multiple checks I've done, I'm wondering if this is something I did this time round to cause this https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=6878756 Never mind, all the pokemon I moved from Pearl have the same problem chalked it up to bad game pak Edited November 22, 2013 by LaprasHunterAnonymous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 It's hacked. Nothing wrong with the Legality Analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bond697 Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 pokedit is garbage. there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Pokecheck is not for screening hacked Pokemon in effort to make them more "lagit". You've not read the OP of the thread; only report false positives with Pokemon you obtain naturally in game. Not hacks. Pokedit is garbage. We're not telling you why your hack shows up as hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcrispell7 Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7161469 Hidden Grotto pokemon need to have their HA, anything caught in a HG without its HA is hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 It seems that Pokécheck is having trouble determining the different forms of the Japanese Oblivia Deoxys events - one that has Speed form moves is showing up as from the Normal form wondercard, thus the moves from the Speed form show as hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatHappenedToStairs Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Few false positives and weird things. https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7576043 - this Metagross shows up as if it were caught as Metang. Caught at Lv. 55, still at that level. Plus, shaking patch can't contain Metang, only Metagross. https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=7553015 - Dream Ball shows up as if it were an Apricorn Ball, even though the Pokémon's OT is from Unova. Also, Shiny. https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=7555776 - Shiny Meloetta is not valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpio Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Meloettas are clearly hacked And Metragross is perfectly fine it can be caught like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tootie Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 French Summer 2013 Shiny creation trio false positives Palkia : https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7613360 Dialga : https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7613358 (is ok but just for comparison) Giratina : https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7613268 Dialga is ok, but palkia and giratina aren't shown as event pokemon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veescrub Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I am getting a hacked notice due to IV spread but the IV spread matches the first possible spread in the warning. Raikou: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7619513 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 I am getting a hacked notice due to IV spread but the IV spread matches the first possible spread in the warning. Raikou: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7619513 The legality analysis is wrongly assuming that it's method K, not method 1. In most cases there is no issue, but method K doesn't include all method 1 spreads. This is also the case with method J. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilixir Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Hi all, I have recently used pokecheck for testing of my pokemons from my pokemon black2 and hgss game. However, I encountered this when i uploaded my scyther caught in hgss into pokecheck. https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7763157 It says under location: Possible method J/K slots don't match encounter. The scyther is not altered and is legitimately caught in the National Park of Soul Silver. May I know what that error means? (ignore the date caught as my DS date was not set properly) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Litterboks Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Hello, I had two false positives on my german event Giratina and Palkia, I guess the event is missing in the database because I got it there. Giratina: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7770346 Event for Giratina (see Europe): http://serebii.net/events/dex/487.shtml Palkia: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7770353 Event for Palkia(see Europe): http://serebii.net/events/dex/484.shtml EDIT: I looked up other Pokemon with this ID in the Pokecheck database, seems every one of them which isn't english/SOM2013 are tagged invalid. Dialga seems to work normal in all languages, see user tootie a few posts before me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Hi all,I have recently used pokecheck for testing of my pokemons from my pokemon black2 and hgss game. However, I encountered this when i uploaded my scyther caught in hgss into pokecheck. https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7763157 It says under location: Possible method J/K slots don't match encounter. The scyther is not altered and is legitimately caught in the National Park of Soul Silver. May I know what that error means? (ignore the date caught as my DS date was not set properly) The method behind the Bug-catching contest isn't entirely known, so that kind of things happens sometimes. Hello,I had two false positives on my german event Giratina and Palkia, I guess the event is missing in the database because I got it there. Giratina: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7770346 Event for Giratina (see Europe): http://serebii.net/events/dex/487.shtml Palkia: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7770353 Event for Palkia(see Europe): http://serebii.net/events/dex/484.shtml EDIT: I looked up other Pokemon with this ID in the Pokecheck database, seems every one of them which isn't english/SOM2013 are tagged invalid. Dialga seems to work normal in all languages, see user tootie a few posts before me Looks like those two Wondercards have to be added to the database. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcrispell7 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 If I am not mistaken, the stationary Jellicent in Undella Bay in B/W2 that comes with it's HA is shiny locked. As such, https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=7720590 is illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brittany Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 (edited) Alright, this is probably a bit off topic, but I'm not exactly sure where else I can put this. Also as a heads up, I'm using a third party hardware to rip my save, and pokegen to rip the .pkm from my save to upload to pokecheck. PokeBank is actually blocking some pokemon that are pokeshifted via pokecheck, but they can go through like normal if pokeshifted on the actual hand hold. I'm not sure if it's how pokecheck is shifting them or what not, but I figured it'd be worth mentioning. For example, my ID RNG abused nicknamed Raikou, Rak'shiri. 4th Generation: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7851072 5th Generation .pkm that was shifted via pokecheck: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7851073 5th Generation .pkm that was shifted using my DS: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7851445 I knew something was up when my friend who RNG abused that ID to nickname our Raikous was able to go forward, as well as her RNG abused ID Keldeo with a nickname. As a test, I shifted both a crown Entei and crown Suicune both on pokecheck and on my handheld. They were able to go forward with no problem, but they are from the Gamestop ID (and not nicknamed). I tried to upload the Suicune and Entei .pkm that were shifted on my DS, but they wouldn't appear in my box. ((I assume because they are identical in every way. Raikou does upload though, even though it appears identical so I'm baffled on that one.)) I did some other additional tests at the suggestion of Dewey911, and this also did not go forward: https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7048977 This is also a WIN2011 pokemon. I did not have any problems with other pokemon from my Soul Silver. Just this Raikou and that Celebi I tested for science. Edit: Actually, I realized last night that I didn't actually transfer the Celebi (I thought it was a Gen 5 .pkm). Celebi does go through when pokeshifted on pokecheck, the Raikou still won't that was pokeshifted. Mmm... Not sure what else I can really test. Edited January 31, 2014 by Britty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cockfighter Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 It states that blazikens DW ability is unreleased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 It states that blazikens DW ability is unreleased or invalid Fixed. The bolded part applies to the particular Blaziken in question, because all of the ones which actually came from the event do not have that message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Shadow Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=4203947 Just noticed my Entralink RNGed Axew from awhile ago is showing up as Night Slash being a hacked move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 (edited) https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=4203947Just noticed my Entralink RNGed Axew from awhile ago is showing up as Night Slash being a hacked move. For reference. In other news, Kangaskhan doesn't get Knock Off from any source at all - it is in no learnset from any game. Some of them have it marked as a tutor move by mistake. Edited February 9, 2014 by Hozu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Pokécheck may be assigning the wrong character for apostrophes when transferring a 4th gen format Pokémon into 5th gen format (notably non-nicknamed Farfetch'd). Apparently anything with an apostrophe that was transferred via Pokécheck is being blocked by Pokémon Bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatHappenedToStairs Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=8334030 - Apparently, Level 3 Raikou is all legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now