I lag even worse in school... I'll go ahead and delete your double post.
I'm well aware that certain old Pokemon have been standing up for a very long time and are still solid cores to the standard metagame. Also, Generation I had more Pokemon than the other generations additions, so ratio wise... think of it that way.
Dragonite was BL actually due to its lack of STAB and interesting moves... and had nothing to really offer over bulky waters or whatever, except for a ginormous movepool. In fact, it wasn't even noticed until Gen IV, and even then it was not really going to do anything that Salamence and Garchomp could already do. Okay, DD + Outrage. But that got denied once Outrage tutor came in and made Salamence a devastating weapon of mass destruction. And tiers do not say everything. Stuff like Alakazam that has dropped down are very viable and yet they're considered UU for some reason. Why would that be?
Nah the Archaeopteryx is another Slaking with less of a penalty (a penalty regardless)... but still quite powerful. However its stats are more or less scarier than Salamence if you look at it that way. The defenses lack as usual but still scary unless you possess some priority move or something that can take the hit and dish back heavy damage (something like Metagross or Azumarill comes into mind).
I'm not even saying one strategy should be as good as the other... that would be boring. However, it should at least make room for versatility, you know. Bulky offense? I use that sometimes, but honestly, I find stall more fun (or annoying, depending on which side you're in)... making it work if it doesn't work, let's say, is like trying to make a Caterpie sweep an entire team. You know what I'm saying?
"They DO look like Pokemon, because they ARE Pokemon, and they were made by GAMEFREAK."
I don't know, of course they are Pokemon but I can still say they look a lot like Fakemon. Quality has gone down the drain in fact. Care to tell me why some people think this way? Maybe they see it in a different angle than you do. Just maybe you know... people think a bit differently than what is within the norms? I could say the same about Gamefreak... they may have been thinking differently when they bought this generation out. The game is good, I'm certain... but some people like me and some others think the Pokemon in this game somewhat ruined the experience. Why would you think that is? It's really our opinion though, you do not need to agree with it, but understand where we are coming from at least. Likewise, I see where you are standing, and it's fine.
Who invited Latias to OU in the first place? Variety is always a good thing, I won't argue with that. But same thing will happen: add more Pokemon, the same Pokemon will still be spammed, but in a different number but possibly in the same ratio as in the past. It's always going to happen so no argument there.
You are missing the point here. Every game with a competitive metagame has this aspect, whether you like it or not. You can say in the early stages Pokemon like Garchomp required no skills to use and pretty much "overspecialized" this metagame, requiring at least two counters to the SD Yachechomp to take down. You buff something, you can end up breaking it (SpeedBoostiken). You nerf something, you can end up making it lose a lot of potential (say goodbye to elemental punching Alakazam). Simple as that.
Base stats cannot change, but sometimes, you can play around with them and make a Pokemon more viable. For example, Azumarill was what one would consider a troll fairy Pokemon in GSC. 100/50/80/50/80/50... eww right? Gen III somehow rectifies that by giving it Huge Power, making the bunny have an equivalent of a base 150 attack! Gen IV did it an even better deal by giving it physical STAB and more moves to abuse. I mean, I wish they would at least try a similar approach to other Pokemon. Some of them even have the potential to evolve. The reason why I pick on Pidgeot a lot is because it has evolved to its final form (3 times and that's that), its two ability slots have been taken, its stats are as if it were a second stage Pokemon, and its movepool is rather shallow too. The only thing I can say will help it is a special item of some sort to give it SOME edge over the other birds, you know? There was that Dream World thing too to give Pokemon some amazing abilities, but of course they messed up on Pidgeot for that too. No other Pokemon aside from Hitmonchan and that sorry excuse of a legendary Pokemon Articuno (at least from what I can think of) got screwed up that badly.
They could also have gone the simpler way... evolve them! Like you know... stuff like Chimecho or Delibird become fighting monsters? Sandslash become a faster ground? Who knows? Evolution would have sufficed for many of them. And because of the "it's a different region you cannot see old Pokemon dur hur" argument, I can also say THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE TO BE IN GAME! Think about this... remember the 17 Pokemon near the back of the Pokedex in Sinnoh? Until Platinum, they were not even part of the game's story at all! Gamefreak was thinking about the competitive players who wanted to, you know, evolve some of their old favorites so they can actually be competition worthy! It would be really nice if they have done that here too... but apparently they could not do that either. What a shame.
Charizard wasn't barely playable before SR. In fact, it was quite a devastating force especially in GSC... but watered down slightly in Advance as bulky waters became more prevalent and its only advantage was Belly Drum, which can be a liability as well.
Tiering will set it right... that's what it was like when we had stuff like Garchomp come in and mess around with people. What about afterwards? Turns out he was overly broken (according to the people... I'm not talking about my personal experience here though).
Dusclops had less of a BST than Pidgeot and ended up OU... where did Pidgeot end up? Distribution matters a lot as well apparently.
Meh, I proposed a lot of changes that could have really helped some stuff that have been outclassed by many others, like Hitmonchan, Pidgeot or Carnivine and stuff like that even. There's no helping for stuff like Beedrill or Butterfree who were meant for early game pwnage really for in-game purposes, but the other Pokemon I've mentioned could be salvaged if something was done for them. Like I said, I agree with the high and low class Pokemon or whatever... I'm no communist.
Breloom will hurt even more with Bullet Seed actually. Think about BP 55 * 2-5 times. A minimum of 110 base power... wouldn't that be interesting?
Don't worry about me not playing anyhow, but as someone who played Pokemon for quite a while I have the right to say what I feel about the new generation. I'd like to play with the new Pokemon, but... what am I going to do with these guys? You either give or take, agreed... but let's say I don't like some of these new Pokemon.
I'm only hoping you're right, but right now it looks like an utter trainwreck, maybe regressing into the likes of the offensive Generation I metagame, only in a larger scale. Who knows?
Yes, I do like some of them too, but for the most part, I think the quality has been butchered. That's just me. You don't have to agree, but see where I am coming from if you can. For example, I like the feminine plant that resembles Roserade in terms of stats (and pure Grass). It still appears Pokemon-ish to me. I don't know about some of the others though. The only generation I saw that had a unique design flare was Generation III, where Hoenn Pokemon were more or less more exotic than the others. Gen II, I can't say much since it's merely a sequel for Gen I and it fit right in. Gen IV though... it was still Pokemon. Still the same type of Pokemon that I can get used to, despite how it had more emphasis on the competitive edge. I cannot help but get disappointed at Gen V's Pokes. That's how I am.