Greencat Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -524 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damio Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -544 actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencat Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 O rly? -554 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damio Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Ya rly. -564 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencat Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -574 I'm tired. Good night everyone. Continue posting here damio and Roland and keep it consecutive. ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damio Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -584 Nah. We can let them catch up a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 chicken wuss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencat Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -604 Lol on my phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HottSushiz Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -603 ...This is just down right unfair, i don't even think people are bothered to try, unless spontaneously, -602 members joined, and posted in this topic until then. LET US CATCH UP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damio Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 I'd rather you didn't catch up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darklord Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 holy **** how the heck can we catch up ?????????????????? -602 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archanfel Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 They can only do that if they post consecutively, but if a normal member intervines, it stops. However, if mods/admins restart posting at the same time, the same thing will hold true. i think this means after a member stops a moderator then our count goes up to 0 If an admin/mod posts while we so happenly are in the negative, then that is -1 for theirs, they count down. However, if they still post consecutively, then that very well shall be -10 instead.and no one is keeping track for the mods -601 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALEGUS Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -600 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtlekid2 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 I'd just like to point out that the new rules broke this thread beyond repair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archanfel Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 i agree -598 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALEGUS Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 *refreshes topic by pressing the deletes all messages* there back to 0 yay lol ---------- Post added at 10:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:48 AM ---------- theres no rule making this not count so... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KazoWAR Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 I dont know what to put! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 How bout -604? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencat Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Or -614? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archanfel Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 guys seriously stop fooling around IT'S 120 no just kidding -613 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KazoWAR Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -612 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archanfel Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -611 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wraith89 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 -610 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Xero Posted April 29, 2009 Author Share Posted April 29, 2009 WTH!?!?!?!?!!!! -610 SUPER WTF!?! OMG! My rule updates are too killer WTF! -609....... ---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ---------- WAIT! Read the rules, Mods, gosh. IF you are in the negative, last i checked, and a MOD POSTS, it goes down -1. NOT -50, or -10, or -whatever ---------- Post added at 07:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:51 PM ---------- Excuse the double-triple posting, BUT SINCE MODS ON HERE DIDNT CATCH THE RULES ON THE FIRST PAGE, AND SCREWED UP BY ADDING -10 WHILE IN THE NEGATIVES INSTEAD OF -1, THEN I GUESS WE GO BACK TO "0". Once again, MODS, if you post once while we are in the positive, it goes to 0. If you post consecutively (more than one mod post without members intervening), then it will go down negative ten. As such: MOD POST #1- 0 MOD POST #2 -10 MEMBER POST -9 MOD POST -10. Listen, mods, if you post while in the negatives, that means it goes down -1, unless, that is, you post consecutively again like in the example shown above. BACK TO 0! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greencat Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 If 2 or more admins post at once, the number will go from 0 to -10, and so on if they keep it up. So, say 5 admins post at once. That is -40, because0 > -10 > -20 > -30 > -40. Then what's this? Currently: -610 It was "Consecutive". We had huge streaks going in case you don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now