wraith89
-
Posts
3519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Pokédex
Portal
Technical Documentation
Pages
Tutorials
Forums
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by wraith89
-
I see. Hey spark, do you have any commentaries on that Pokemon I made? I've ALWAYS wanted something with auto-haze, but to offset its usage, I'd have to make its stats fairly low.
-
Yes, support Froslass is usually better, but my offensive Froslass has also caused some mayhem. Give her Choice Specs with Trick and Ice Beam, Thunderbolt and Shadow Ball and watch her wreak havoc
-
So people, have you ever wanted to create your own Pokemon? Yeah, lame and all, I know. So I got a PM from Pokemonfan saying in a nutshell "hey, we should create something like Smogon's Create-A-Pokemon". Eh... no, not Smogony, but why not create our own Pokemon just for fun? So the rules are simple... we create a Pokemon, and then once a Pokemon's been created, members will give feedback to the Pokemon regarding its balance and personal opinions and whatnot. Idea of this thread is accredited to pokemonfan. So what is the format? Sprite (put only if you made one) Pokemon Name Pokemon Classification Type Gender Distribution Abilities (and its description too if it is custom) Held item (if any) Egg Group Height Weight Pokedex Data Base Stats TMs Move Tutor moves Hereditary Moves If there are any evolutions, denote that by using the arrows. Okay... I think I'll start. And make sure you SPOILERIZE ([noparse] [/noparse]) your Pokemon. This Pokemon needs some balancing :-/
-
Yeah, you're right. I'm wrong Lum Berry for anti-leads then. Whoohoo But Froslass isn't known for her defense... and she still wants her speed
-
Smogon can help, but I'd rather create my own moveset. As for Froslass, she wants Timid rather than Modest. Sure, Modest raises her modest special attack power (no pun intended), but she wants to outspeed threats to actually do something rather than just die. Froslass would rather hold Focus Sash for her frailty and has other options than just attacking. If you're opting for Blizzard, she wants to be in a hail team to take advantage of Snow Cloak too (and do over 26% extra damage than Ice Beam would). I got mine to have Thunder Wave, Spikes, Substitute, and Blizzard, but Destiny Bond is a really good choice too. Spiking support from Froslass is invaluable, for she can also block Rapid Spin. Thunder Wave cripples speedy sweepers, and behind a sub, a Synchronize Pokemon can't paralyze Froslass either. And those who are immune to Thunder Wave hate STAB Blizzard anyways (Ground Pokes are weak to Ice) or take a lot of damage from it (Electivire and Jolteon aren't exactly too sturdy). This Froslass is a supporting Froslass and works best in hail. Shadow Ball or Thunderbolt can also work though, if you like that. Trick is a nice option, especially with Choice Scarf or Choice Specs. You can cripple your opponents if you predict nicely. I wouldn't use Hail as a move though. She rarely gets time to set that up and the hail is TOO short. Just pair her up with Abomasnow if you want hail to take its greatest effect.
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Fun fact: there are more written documents (outside of the Gospels) written about Jesus Christ than any other important figures of his time (look up people like Pliny the Elder, Tacitus, Josephus, etc...).</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>You'd really have to question those over 9000 people who willingly died for a "person who didn't exist". And don't bring up Jonestown... many were coerced, and did not die for a resurrection of a "non-existent person", so that's not a good comparison.</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Fun fact: there are more written documents (outside of the Gospels) written about Jesus Christ than any other important figures of his time (look up people like Pliny the Elder, Tacitus, Josephus, etc...).</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>You'd really have to question those over 9000 people who willingly died for a "person who didn't exist". And don't bring up Jonestown... many were coerced, and did not die for a resurrection of a "non-existent person", so that's not a good comparison.</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>I am SO busting Satan for what he's doing to me for the past few days >:-(</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>I am SO busting Satan for what he's doing to me for the past few days >:-(</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>You ought to get AIM or MSN or something. We can talk there anytime. I'd like to be more personable with members here you know, not some distant staff member that is so hard to reach or stuff like that.</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>You ought to get AIM or MSN or something. We can talk there anytime. I'd like to be more personable with members here you know, not some distant staff member that is so hard to reach or stuff like that.</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>It's confusing, therefore stand your ground. But don't just dismiss things as non-existent just because YOU can't see them. Understand?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>It's confusing, therefore stand your ground. But don't just dismiss things as non-existent just because YOU can't see them. Understand?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
But it wasn't luck either. Did we get all this through luck? It's getting almost irrelevant here... we are NOT here to attack one another's faith.
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Like I said, you don't know everything, nor do you know half of everything. Maybe I know that other half you don't.</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Through faith you can see things that are not visible to your eyes. It's stubbornness that tells men to not believe in stuff not seen because they can't perceive it. Well, what if there are? And if so, how can you just dismiss them by saying "they don't exist" when some people say "there are"?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Like I said, you don't know everything, nor do you know half of everything. Maybe I know that other half you don't.</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Through faith you can see things that are not visible to your eyes. It's stubbornness that tells men to not believe in stuff not seen because they can't perceive it. Well, what if there are? And if so, how can you just dismiss them by saying "they don't exist" when some people say "there are"?</p></p></p></p></p>
-
Another bias... "there are no such things as supernaturals". How do you know? Is this world all there is?
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Absence of evidence != evidence of absence.</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Live a world without God, you'll feel empty inside. Don't be so rash into accepting "oh, there's not enough proof, therefore it must not exist". Once again... how do you know?</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>You don't know everything, nor do you know half of everything. If you knew half of everything... say that the other half was God's existence... and others knew that half you didn't.</p></p></p></p></p>
-
<p><p><p><p><p>Absence of evidence != evidence of absence.</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>Live a world without God, you'll feel empty inside. Don't be so rash into accepting "oh, there's not enough proof, therefore it must not exist". Once again... how do you know?</p></p></p></p></p>
<p><p><p><p><p>You don't know everything, nor do you know half of everything. If you knew half of everything... say that the other half was God's existence... and others knew that half you didn't.</p></p></p></p></p>
