Dark Ray Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298 k (note: nationality is kept when hatching a traded egg; presumably the origin game doesn't either). Gen IV ~= Gen V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1691764 TMs held by 4th gen format mons should reflect the 4th gen TM, not 5th gen ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavy_metal Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 (edited) https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647 false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball) *i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball) *ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal Edited December 13, 2012 by heavy_metal post in spanish cuz im not speak good english xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agonist Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball) *i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball) *ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal No, just no. There is nothing wrong with the Legality Analysis in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brittany Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298 That's funny; I was just about to report that. I never would've noticed this if I didn't have those pokemon accidentally not private. I just clicked them randomly trying to figure out why I had a Marstomp thinking that was my B2, but my SS had the same name. I only uploaded these guys to see who had random 31's, and never thought to check the legality analysis. More technical information: When starting my JP SS long before the English release, I sent myself some eggs from my English Pearl. When going through my other pokemon from my English Pearl, I noticed it does the same thing with pokemon traded from my JP Diamiond to the English Pearl before they hatched. Going to list all the trainer information just in case it helps, but I am beginning to believe the origin trainer of the egg sets the location of the OTs game, even if it is different. Pokemon from English Pearl with her OT: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604921 (Not sure why this one is missing some trashbytes, it was hatched on my retail copy) https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604919 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604932 (Also missing hatch trashbytes?) https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604917 (Same as above.) http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1537738 Eggs that originated on my JP Diamond that hatched on English Pearl: Not a false positive, but displays wrong game for the OT, matching the origin game. https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713666 Pokemon from JP Diamond: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1708824 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713672 Pokemon from JP SS: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949348 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949332 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949322 Pokemon that originated in my ENG Pearl, but hatched on JP SS: False Positives http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949223 http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949224 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949294 Other False positives: My surfing Raichu who was caught as a pikachu on the pokewalker on JP SS: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949225 Flail Pikachu from same pokewalker course: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949273 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xfr Posted December 20, 2012 Author Share Posted December 20, 2012 Updated some stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcos9191 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Lack update the world12 pikachu spanish version, missing the title of the wonder card but the pokemon could be added because the type of pid is the same for all pikachu's that event: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2397789 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 (edited) http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816 False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!) Edit: 5 new borns. Breed on W1 and then hatched on W2, all saying are from the WC #29: A Secret Egg! https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021889 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021890 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021892 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021894 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021895 Edited December 21, 2012 by Aleph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainThunder Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 (edited) Newly contributed Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona has not been updated yet. My two eggs from Kanto Starter Egg event, Charmander (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010271) and Bulbasaur (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010273) is showed up as "Met location does not match wondercard". This Bulbasaur is hatched at Virbank City, while Charmander is hatched at Floccesy Town.My other egg, Squirtle (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010272), does not have any problem. E: Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona was updated. Edited January 1, 2013 by RainThunder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcos9191 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!) This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change) http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=29038165 new borns. Breed on W1 and then hatched on W2, all saying are from the WC #29: A Secret Egg! https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021889 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021890 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021892 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021894 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021895 This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363 note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version): https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agonist Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 This is an illegal egg move combination. Shellos can't get both Yawn and Mirror Coat to pass onto it. reposting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change)This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363 note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version): https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837 You're a rather poor script kiddie if you can't even figure legality out. The issue is that a NON-EVENT Axew egg is being incorrectly flagged as the event. http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3042177 Mew is not a valid Entralink Pokémon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasoman Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 There needs to be work for Black and White 2. LOL. :tongue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 There needs to be work for Black and White 2. LOL. :tongue: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3047748 Version: Black 2 Un-terminated OT name field. Encounter Type: Tall Grass. Nothing to see here. Already muted you on the shoutbox for complaining about why your hack showed up as hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavy_metal Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 false positive stoutland with dw (scrappy) its avaliable so pokecheck mark hack pokemon http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=328723 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agonist Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 It's showing up hacked like it should. Nothing to complain about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Yep. Just a hack. For the record, it's been implemented already. (private pkm but just saying it's been working for a while) Please, don't trust @caldemc for any uploads because they're (almost) always hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcrispell7 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 False Positive: Gen 5 format Safari Zone pokemon show up as being in a hacked ball http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847514 despite the location recognizing it as a Safari zone pokemon. For comparison, here is the same Ditto in gen 4 format http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847510 (not sure if this helps any, but just in case) On a related note, only Great Marsh pokemon seem to have a Safari Zone/Great Marsh encounter type (as seen here http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2356967) whereas HG/SS Safari Zone pokemon are labeled as a Tall Grass encounter type, like the Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hozu Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3070134 The LA seems to forget that Nidorina's previous evolution is in the Field egg group. The original one shows up fine: http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=945667 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icalasari Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Got a false positive on my Kingdra I'm not surprised that the IVs came up as likely hacked (I am so proud of these guy being able to fool a legality checker into thinking he's fake). However, I AM surprised about this: Nickname Neptune\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\xFFFF All characters in name are valid. This Pokémon is missing DPPt hatch trash bytes. The heck is going on here? EDIT: Link to the legality check screenshot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Pokemon in question: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3079386, user @thelasil Orange color text is a warning for the user to evaluate, because it is not indicative of a hack. Eggs hatched in Gen 4 have trash bytes. Yours is missing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icalasari Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 What would cause a Pokemon to suddenly be missing its trash bytes, exactly? I know that I've been having some issues with transferring my Pokemon from Gen IV to Gen V (my Dialga spontaneously learned Spacial Rend during the transfer), so knowing if its a problem with my gen IV games or my gen V games would be nice =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaphotics Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Using the renamer guy iirc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icalasari Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Ok then, I know what happened in that case (His name was originally Tsunami) Thanks for the help there. I thought that the site legitimately thought he was hacked for some reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now