Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

[Dark Ray]

LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

[Kaphotics]

LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

k

(note: nationality is kept when hatching a traded egg; presumably the origin game doesn't either). Gen IV ~= Gen V

[Hozu]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1691764

TMs held by 4th gen format mons should reflect the 4th gen TM, not 5th gen ones.

[heavy_metal]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647

false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball)

*i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun

falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball)

*ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal

Edited December 13, 2012 by heavy_metal
post in spanish cuz im not speak good english xD

[Agonist]

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647

false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball)

*i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun

falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball)

*ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal

No, just no. There is nothing wrong with the Legality Analysis in this case.

[Brittany]

LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

That's funny; I was just about to report that. I never would've noticed this if I didn't have those pokemon accidentally not private. I just clicked them randomly trying to figure out why I had a Marstomp thinking that was my B2, but my SS had the same name. I only uploaded these guys to see who had random 31's, and never thought to check the legality analysis.

More technical information:

When starting my JP SS long before the English release, I sent myself some eggs from my English Pearl. When going through my other pokemon from my English Pearl, I noticed it does the same thing with pokemon traded from my JP Diamiond to the English Pearl before they hatched.

Going to list all the trainer information just in case it helps, but I am beginning to believe the origin trainer of the egg sets the location of the OTs game, even if it is different.

Pokemon from English Pearl with her OT:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604921 (Not sure why this one is missing some trashbytes, it was hatched on my retail copy)

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604919

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604932 (Also missing hatch trashbytes?)

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604917 (Same as above.)

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1537738

Eggs that originated on my JP Diamond that hatched on English Pearl: Not a false positive, but displays wrong game for the OT, matching the origin game.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713666

Pokemon from JP Diamond:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1708824

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713672

Pokemon from JP SS:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949348

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949332

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949322

Pokemon that originated in my ENG Pearl, but hatched on JP SS: False Positives

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949223

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949224

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949294

Other False positives:

My surfing Raichu who was caught as a pikachu on the pokewalker on JP SS: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949225

Flail Pikachu from same pokewalker course: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949273

[xfr]

Updated some stuff

[marcos9191]

Lack update the world12 pikachu spanish version, missing the title of the wonder card but the pokemon could be added because the type of pid is the same for all pikachu's that event:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2397789

[Aleph]

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816

False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!)

Edit:

5 new borns. Breed on W1 and then hatched on W2, all saying are from the WC #29: A Secret Egg!

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021889

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021890

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021892

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021894

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021895

Edited December 21, 2012 by Aleph

[RainThunder]

Newly contributed Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona has not been updated yet.

My two eggs from Kanto Starter Egg event, Charmander (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010271) and Bulbasaur (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010273) is showed up as "Met location does not match wondercard". This Bulbasaur is hatched at Virbank City, while Charmander is hatched at Floccesy Town.

My other egg, Squirtle (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010272), does not have any problem.

E: Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona was updated.

Edited January 1, 2013 by RainThunder

[marcos9191]

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816

False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!)

This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change)

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816

5 new borns. Breed on W1 and then hatched on W2, all saying are from the WC #29: A Secret Egg!

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021889

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021890

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021892

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021894

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021895

This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363

note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition

In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version):

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837

[Agonist]

This is an illegal egg move combination. Shellos can't get both Yawn and Mirror Coat to pass onto it.

reposting.

[Hozu]

This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change)

This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363

note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition

In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version):

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837

You're a rather poor script kiddie if you can't even figure legality out. The issue is that a NON-EVENT Axew egg is being incorrectly flagged as the event.

http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3042177

Mew is not a valid Entralink Pokémon.

[Kasoman]

There needs to be work for Black and White 2. LOL. :tongue:

[Kaphotics]

There needs to be work for Black and White 2. LOL. :tongue:

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3047748

Version: Black 2

Un-terminated OT name field.

Encounter Type: Tall Grass.

Nothing to see here. Already muted you on the shoutbox for complaining about why your hack showed up as hacked.

[heavy_metal]

false positive stoutland with dw (scrappy) its avaliable so pokecheck mark hack pokemon

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=328723

[Agonist]

It's showing up hacked like it should. Nothing to complain about.

[Kaphotics]

Yep. Just a hack.

For the record, it's been implemented already.

(private pkm but just saying it's been working for a while)

Please, don't trust @caldemc for any uploads because they're (almost) always hacked.

[dcrispell7]

False Positive:

Gen 5 format Safari Zone pokemon show up as being in a hacked ball http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847514 despite the location recognizing it as a Safari zone pokemon.

For comparison, here is the same Ditto in gen 4 format http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847510 (not sure if this helps any, but just in case)

On a related note, only Great Marsh pokemon seem to have a Safari Zone/Great Marsh encounter type (as seen here http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2356967) whereas HG/SS Safari Zone pokemon are labeled as a Tall Grass encounter type, like the Ditto.

[Hozu]

http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3070134

The LA seems to forget that Nidorina's previous evolution is in the Field egg group. The original one shows up fine: http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=945667

[Icalasari]

Got a false positive on my Kingdra

I'm not surprised that the IVs came up as likely hacked (I am so proud of these guy being able to fool a legality checker into thinking he's fake). However, I AM surprised about this:

Nickname Neptune\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\xFFFF

All characters in name are valid.

This Pokémon is missing DPPt hatch trash bytes.

The heck is going on here?

EDIT: Link to the legality check screenshot

[Kaphotics]

Pokemon in question:

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3079386, user @thelasil

Orange color text is a warning for the user to evaluate, because it is not indicative of a hack.

Eggs hatched in Gen 4 have trash bytes. Yours is missing them.

[Icalasari]

What would cause a Pokemon to suddenly be missing its trash bytes, exactly? I know that I've been having some issues with transferring my Pokemon from Gen IV to Gen V (my Dialga spontaneously learned Spacial Rend during the transfer), so knowing if its a problem with my gen IV games or my gen V games would be nice =/

[Kaphotics]

Using the renamer guy iirc.

[Icalasari]

Ok then, I know what happened in that case (His name was originally Tsunami)

Thanks for the help there. I thought that the site legitimately thought he was hacked for some reason