[BUG] Suicune flagged illegal on PKHeX

[dji]

I do not understand ... I capture it without modifying anything ... why do I get it that way?

[theSLAYER]

41 minutes ago, dji said:

Upload the file when referring to it.
 

Is it caught the second time? Mine was caught the first time round (I think) so the location is different.

https://projectpokemon.org/home/files/file/2899-the-under-subway-shadow-suicune/

edit:
1. Your post isn't "creative discussion". Please post it at the correct sub-topic (post moved)
2. Your title wasn't concise so I changed it

[dji]

If I think it was the 2nd or the 3rd time ... but I do not understand why it's illegal for me if I do not change anything

[theSLAYER]

1 minute ago, dji said:

If I think it was the 2nd or the 3rd time ... but I do not understand why it's illegal for me if I do not change anything

It's possible that PKHeX only checked the first static encounter, not the second or third.

Also, I moved your post (explanation in my previous post)

[dji]

Sorry, my English is worthwhile ...

[theSLAYER]

1 minute ago, dji said:

Sorry, my English is worthwhile ...

No worries.

In the meanwhile, upload your Suicune.

@Kaphotics will check it.

[dji]

is that as I do not know where to post this kind of thing

 

245 - SUICUNE - B4BA8994A8D9.ck3

 

Thanks for everything, by the way you did not answer me in the question that I asked you in my last post

[theSLAYER]

7 minutes ago, dji said:

is that as I do not know where to post this kind of thing

 

245 - SUICUNE - B4BA8994A8D9.ck3

 

Thanks for everything, by the way you did not answer me in the question that I asked you in my last post

I merged your posts. Don't multi-post. If no one replied you, and you have new information to add, edit your old post.

7 minutes ago, dji said:

by the way you did not answer me in the question that I asked you in my last post

This one?

16 minutes ago, dji said:

but I do not understand why it's illegal for me if I do not change anything

I already replied you, here:

13 minutes ago, theSLAYER said:

It's possible that PKHeX only checked the first static encounter, not the second or third.

 

[dji]

I understand I will try to see what it would be when I go for feebas, and how do you know if they have edited the pid ?, and as far as this is concerned? I mean it already indicates male and female but 12.5% will not be interpreted etc

[Kaphotics]

Was originally added as met location 104

https://github.com/kwsch/PKHeX/commit/afde4514e283acb88c89b9f9c19c7d5138d7ce6e#diff-83a32d69355a64376bc77bd07e338a33R446

I have another save file that uses met location 110 (like this one) so I assume it was originally a copypaste assumption from Sudowoodo.

Done, changed by: https://github.com/kwsch/PKHeX/commit/03a05364abeb000ca4cea345631a8fa6396ad7ea

[dji]

absolutely not change anything to suicune I just put in pk hex to know the ivs I had and it came out