Toffeuy Posted October 11, 2009 Posted October 11, 2009 9/10 - Cool but I still think the old sigs you made like the Flareon and Vaporeon ones are better.
Toffeuy Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 The old ones just looks more cool, probably because of the smudge effects...
Scwib Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 lol okay. I smudge on these newer sigs as well, but I use a lot more effects with them.
Toffeuy Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Rate, crit and suggest adjustments please: Reveal hidden contents I know, there's quite a few...
Shining Mew2 Posted October 13, 2009 Posted October 13, 2009 10/10 for the Gengar and the red gayrados but for raquaza 9/10 because the purple \:
Toffeuy Posted October 13, 2009 Posted October 13, 2009 How about someone rate this?: Reveal hidden contents
Greencat Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 @Toffeuy: Gengar - 7/10 The extra ones are bit odd. It's all just one color--purple. Gyrados - 7/10 Same style. Not very colorful. Very few different shades. Overall, they are good. Although I suggest you try looking into other effects except that one and IMO, it doesn't look very exciting. Maybe try adding extra colors and change the light source?
Illithian Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Toffeuy said: I didn't really like the second one either actually. For the second one I followed a tutorial and that tutorial was specifically made to suit a certain character, but instead of using that character I used Dragonite which may have ruined it.How about rate this one, I made most of it through experimenting with opacities and filters, only one layer used someone else's technique. The others I thought of myself: Reveal hidden contents Something just feels weird about this signature, maybe its colour is a little mixed, not sure what it is. Just something makes it not look as good, so i'm not expecting a too-high ranking. I made this one out of boredom, I can gift it to anyone if you want, PM me if you want it, first come first serve. If you PM me and someone has already got it, too bad. Whoever asks for it first I will add their name to the signature and they get to keep it. Toffeuy, the problem with your new one is the whole thing has too little contrast. Basically that means the entire thing is bright. Theres no light source, theres no darkness, theres no depth. You can fix this by basically adding black brush strokes and using blending effects, and increasing the contrast, and changing the curves. But you have to figure out where is your light source, how are you going to use that, where is the darkness. Rate my new sig? Reveal hidden contents
Toffeuy Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Thx for the tips For your sig, i'll give it around 9.3/10 - Pretty busy right now, can't be bothered giving explanations.
Illithian Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Toffeuy said: Thx for the tips For your sig, i'll give it around 9.3/10 - Pretty busy right now, can't be bothered giving explanations. Toffeuy, to show how easy it is to fix your sig, I kinda did it myself: Its not perfect, but its a good start. Basically I added a c4d, changed the curves (always just use 2 dots), slightly increased brightness and increased contrast using adjustment layers. I erased some over the render so it didn't look weird and it ended up fine. =) Good luck
Ziz Posted October 19, 2009 Posted October 19, 2009 Rate: Reveal hidden contents Too...many...effects...the making of this signature probably enhanced my Photoshop knowledge tenfold. Illithian said: Rate my new sig? Reveal hidden contents 10/10 I love the color and flow of this one. It's pretty amazing.
Gallade Posted October 22, 2009 Posted October 22, 2009 Illithian said: Rate new sig please: It's done very good but in my opinion it's a bit too busy.. I don't know where I have too look in the first instance. Maybe changing the background color's (or foreground?) would help. If I could make something like this I would be very satisfied but comparing it to your other works i don't think it's your best. 8/10 G.
Ziz Posted October 24, 2009 Posted October 24, 2009 (edited) Rate my new signature: Reveal hidden contents The lighting is a problem. Edited October 25, 2009 by Ziz
Toffeuy Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 9.2/10 - Was that a c4d you put in? It looks a bit weird when it's over majority of the stock, Unless it was supposed to be like a special made effect like being trapped in ice or something. And those white effects to the left of the head seems weird. It's really good, best you've done in a while.
Ziz Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Toffeuy said: 9.2/10 - Was that a c4d you put in? It looks a bit weird when it's over majority of the stock, Unless it was supposed to be like a special made effect like being trapped in ice or something. And those white effects to the left of the head seems weird.It's really good, best you've done in a while. The whole thing was composed of various C4Ds...since I never really use them all that much, I decided to give it a try.
Mewtwo Ex Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 Naru-Chu said: Rate my new signature: Reveal hidden contents The lighting is a problem. ...S@MuS... It looks good, but it could do a small metroid somewhere behind samus.
Ziz Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 (edited) Reveal hidden contents I added a gradient map and a clipping mask...I think this one is a lot better. But idk... EDIT: Reveal hidden contents Made this one out of boredom. Edited October 29, 2009 by Ziz
Mewtwo Ex Posted October 25, 2009 Posted October 25, 2009 /me *drools* at the second i saw it. Awsome work!
Kaito Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 Naru-Chu said: I don't see the flow in that sig. The focus point in that sig is the gun but I suppose your focus point needs to be Samus? And your Font+Placing of your text is to random Same as above See bold for the comments.
Ziz Posted November 7, 2009 Posted November 7, 2009 Kaito said: See bold for the comments. Where exactly would the text placement be better and not more "Random"? There's a big black space at the left, so why on earth would you put the text somewhere else? I do see what you mean about the flow, but the focal point doesn't need to be Samus' gun. I focused the image more on Samus as a whole.
Gallade Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Hey everyone, Please rate my newest sig. I tried a lot of new things. Advice for futuresigs is always appreciated! Reveal hidden contents G.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now