Jump to content

PK8: SWSH Uncatchable Series .

Project Pokémon Bot
 Share

41 Screenshots

About This File

This page ignores any uncatchables introduced via Max Raid Events.

Encounters
Slumbering Weald Skwovet x2 - These are forced encounters. At this point of the game, player has no balls.
Slumbering Weald Rookidee - Another forced encounter. At this point of the game, player has no balls.
Slumbering Weald Zacian (SW) / Zamazenta (SH) - Appears in the fog as a fog/illusion thing, which the player is unable to land hits. At this point of the game, player has no balls. I can't be sure, but I think the bag option doesn't show up.
Tower Summit Eternamax Eternatus - When captured using alternative EncounterScenarios, it retains the Eternamax form (until game is switched off)
Turffield Stadium Tsareena - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Hulbury Stadium Gyarados - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Motostoke Stadium Torkoal - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Circhester Stadium Gigalith (SW) / Froslass (SH) - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Stow-on-side Stadium Conkeldurr (SW) / Dusknoir (SH) - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Hammerlocke Stadium Haxorus - Crazed Dynamax'd mon in post game. Normally cannot be caught.
Honeycalm Island Vespiquen (tree) - Part of the story to get the Max Honey. Normally cannot be caught.
Dyna Tree Hill Greedent (tree) - Attacks the player when the Dyna Tree was shaken. Normally cannot be caught.
??? Victini - Leftover/unused encounter in the game. By changing the EncounterID from a known encounter to the EncounterID of this, I'm able to force this encounter slot to appear. Not known if it is meant for testing or was intended as an encounter at some point. The met location of this file has been wiped.
??? Kubfu - Leftover/unused encounter in the game. By changing the EncounterID from a known encounter to the EncounterID of this, I'm able to force this encounter slot to appear. Not known if it is meant for testing or was intended as an encounter at some point. The met location of this file has been wiped.
??? Poipole - Leftover/unused encounter in the game. By changing the EncounterID from a known encounter to the EncounterID of this, I'm able to force this encounter slot to appear. Not known if it is meant for testing or was intended as an encounter at some point. The met location of this file has been wiped.
??? Cosmog - Leftover/unused encounter in the game. By changing the EncounterID from a known encounter to the EncounterID of this, I'm able to force this encounter slot to appear. Not known if it is meant for testing or was intended as an encounter at some point. The met location of this file has been wiped.

Note: Crossed out entries are not obtained as of this post.

 Share
Previous File PK8: Unobtainable Eternamax Eternatus
Next File PK3: Unreleased METEOR Jirachi (ENG)

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Guest

Guest

Posted

So, are these not legitimate to use/have?

theSLAYER

theSLAYER 4358

Posted

4 minutes ago, PkHexBoi said:

So, are these not legitimate to use/have?

Hmmm.. It's as though you didn't read the disclaimer at the head of this section..

image.png
:3

  • Like 1
foohyfooh

foohyfooh 58

Posted

While I agree that someone shouldn't think that uncatchable Pokémon would be legal, in their defence, you may not see the section header since you can directly get to this post via the "What's New" carousel on the Downloads page. 

theSLAYER

theSLAYER 4358

Posted

26 minutes ago, foohyfooh said:

While I agree that someone shouldn't think that uncatchable Pokémon would be legal, in their defence, you may not see the section header since you can directly get to this post via the "What's New" carousel on the Downloads page. 

Don't get me wrong, I'm just having a bit of fun. Don't you see the smiley I attached after the image? :)
I wasn't seriously criticizing them. It's just.. we get this kind of question all the time.

So, it was a multifaceted response; in one angle, if one received this kind of response, one'll always check the overall section before asking such questions ever again, well at least hopefully that's the case.
In another angle, I actually did answer the question; I took a screenshot that spells the answer and focuses on the big bold red test, instead of being plainly rude.
In yet another angle, I also taught future readers that there is an overall section header, in case they were unaware. Hopefully, they'll come to realize that various uploads are in various different sections, and each section covers their own niche.

foohyfooh

foohyfooh 58

Posted

16 minutes ago, theSLAYER said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm just having a bit of fun. Don't you see the smiley I attached after the image? :)
I wasn't seriously criticizing them. It's just.. we get this kind of question all the time.

Oh I didn't notice the smiley face.

And, it is true, you did answer the question.

  • Like 1
Guest

Guest

Posted

23 hours ago, theSLAYER said:

Hmmm.. It's as though you didn't read the disclaimer at the head of this section..

image.png
:3

 

Probably because I went directly to the post, ya know? Instead of going through subcategories and all that other junk. 'Cause ya know, it shows up on the main Downloads page...

theSLAYER

theSLAYER 4358

Posted

13 minutes ago, PkHexBoi said:

Probably because I went directly to the post, ya know? Instead of going through subcategories and all that other junk. 'Cause ya know, it shows up on the main Downloads page...

And it's as tho you didn't read the other comments.
 

8 hours ago, foohyfooh said:

in their defence, you may not see the section header since you can directly get to this post via the "What's New" carousel on the Downloads page. 

@PkHexBoi if you weren't aware, someone already came to your defense with that exact reasoning. And...
 

7 hours ago, theSLAYER said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm just having a bit of fun. Don't you see the smiley I attached after the image? :)
I wasn't seriously criticizing them. It's just.. we get this kind of question all the time.

So, it was a multifaceted response; in one angle, if one received this kind of response, one'll always check the overall section before asking such questions ever again, well at least hopefully that's the case.
In another angle, I actually did answer the question; I took a screenshot that spells the answer and focuses on the big bold red test, instead of being plainly rude.
In yet another angle, I also taught future readers that there is an overall section header, in case they were unaware. Hopefully, they'll come to realize that various uploads are in various different sections, and each section covers their own niche.

... I've literally explained how I wasn't serious at my reply to you, and how it was a multifaceted response. It wasn't just a message having fun with ya, it also aimed to educate future readers or readers that are unaware.

And frankly, I went straight to this post isn't really a good reason..
image.png


Do people really expect stuff in the Unreleased/Beta PKM Gallery to be legal? 😜
 

Quote

Instead of going through subcategories and all that other junk.

As someone who uploads a bunch of files to our main subcategories, I take offense at that 😜


Anyhow, sheesh, this is why they need warning labels on obviously hot coffee, and why I typically lock comments on uploads.

Guest

Guest

Posted

I *did* read it. I like to speak for myself.

theSLAYER

theSLAYER 4358

Posted

6 minutes ago, PkHexBoi said:

I *did* read it. I like to speak for myself.

Your actions seem to speak otherwise.

Guest
This file is now closed to further comments.
×
×
  • Create New...