Lorshinator's Content - Page 68 - Project Pokemon Forums

Lorshinator

wraith89

Changed it again. >.<

It was your friendly neighborhood ice cream truck driver Sweet Tooth! (gets killed)

Well, now it's a Krogan from the game Mass Effect, an alien race kind of like orks but have a reptilian theme. I love them. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/laugh.png" alt="xD" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/laugh@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" /> (character's name is Wrex).

One of my friends had a megaman game for the PS1, and we had a load of fun with that. Never really played the games too much myself though. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/unsure.png" alt=":/" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/unsure@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

<div class="ipsSpoiler_contents"> Actually, despite the disturbing theme of sweet Tooth, I like his vehicle. One thing I can safely say though is that I prefer the other characters in the game that are "more good guy" but finding a picture for them is hard. </div>

</div>

February 22, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Its SHMEGA MAN!

You're always causing my mind to explode with unexpectancy...

February 20, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Also I will post on your thread, but perhaps a little later.

Do you think that you might be on PP to speak about some stuff? I kind of want to mention more about stuff, I guess. If not, understandable.

February 17, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Yeah. Then again, I usually worry about other things I suppose, mostly related to economics and war. Yes, they are tied together... The idea of getting rid of the military sounds like the princess (supposedly) in Felix the Cat: The movie. Never heard of it? I don't blame you, I didn't either, but there's this internet reviewer who, well, reviewed it, and he was like... You disbanded the army?

I personally like the idea of AC4A... It's very realistic. (Keep in mind it's the entire planet, not JUST a nation.) I just like it because at first you join the league, thinking they are the obvious good guys. Then, when you beat the game, you can replay it, and then you're like, 'Imma be baad hehehehe!" But it doesn't work that way... It's interesting. And to think this is a Japanese game.

February 17, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

If you want to check out the game I was mentioning you can. Probably not your tastes, but I like the concept(s). It was criticized for it's story, believe it or not, because it was confusing. Probably because there was no-good guy or bad guy figure, but it was all understandable....

I think Feminism is bad mostly because it asks for too much...

February 17, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

And just because I'm 16 does not mean I'm "blinded" by society. I tend not to think.

Also... When I say "not people" it obviously does not mean "not human". But they were not recognized as people. Perhaps I am being idealistic, but I tend not to think exactly how the media tells me to think. In my law class, most people agreed with every outcome of every case... I didn't. There was this one scenario where a guy was let free of trafficking simply because the police forgot to tell him he could get a lawyer within three minutes. That, and judges waste so much time solving cases. In my class, I generally disagreed with everything I thought was unjust, but most of the class didn't.

Skirt bam wut?

Well, I did do a project on Nellie McClung. Initial motives were fine. But I just think that it should be based on equal respect, not BS like AA...

February 17, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Just saying, when I referred to the Government, it was what they could have done. But yes they let it in.

And by saying feminism isn't bad is "not having an opinion?" I've got an opinion, actually. INITIALLY, feminism isn't BAD. It just asks for rights to vote and LIKE RELIGION, BUSINESS, MONEY, COURTS, GOVERNMENT, LAW, WORK, MILITARY, WAR, VOTING, RIGHTS, FREEDOMS, ETC, they have been twisted out of proportion to fit into what it is supposed to be. Honestly? Saying I have "no opinion"? I am not against feminists... Unless their causes are ridiculous. For instance, asking to vote? Very well. Asking to get rid of the military? Ridiculous, out of the question. If they were saying, "whatever happens, let's try not to get involved in another war unless there is no possible out come, we have to, then yes."

February 17, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Then, there's the big bad, ORCA. These guys are similar to the League but are much more extreme. They will manually take down the cradles and force humanity to find a way to clean up the mess we made, and it is possible to do so. While they may seem malicious, but have very good intentions. They seek to preserve humanity and find a solution, even if it means killing millions upon billions of people to do so.

So... I have to ask you, in the end run, you have to choose, either between preserving the Cradles and facing inevitable doom or choosing ORCA and being responsible for billions of casualties but ultimately saving humanity?

<div class="ipsSpoiler_contents">p.s, there's a guy you can team up with who takes down the Cradles for the pleasure of killing. I know I don't fit that boat.</div>

</div>

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

There is this game called Armored Core 4: For Answer. It is a mech combat game. You know, gundam? (Except this is very scientific/logical/explained and pro-environmental, which is why I like it).

The world is very polluted and the surface of the planet is uninhabitable. Corporations (course) fight over the last of the resources available for different motives. You, a mercenary, has to choose your path. There are three factions: The League, Line Ark, and ORCA. The league controls all of the resources and corporations in an effort to sustain humanity. Humanity resides in these ships called Cradles which house millions of people per Cradle (there's a whole fleet). However, the cradles pollute the atmosphere, so inevitably, if it continues without improvement, humanity will die regardless. Line Ark opposes the league because they are negligent to seek a resolution, but ultimately they get wiped out because of their rebelliousness (which was not extreme if I remember correctly.)

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

I do hope you do not see my opinions, which are somewhat different from yours, as hostile, because I'm not saying you're wrong, even if I challenge it. Because philosophical questions such as that cannot be answered in a simple "right or wrong", because people view things differently. If it was truly wrong, 100% of the things you say would be true. If it was mix, 100% of what I said would be true. Are they true? According to us and our own values, yes, but to others, they may accept some and disregard others, or be entirely for or against. Again, don't look at my statements as hostile, I am not saying you are incorrect (although you may very well be stating mine are).

A little of topic question, but there are some questions in video games which although are rare, state interesting points. I will speak about this in the next post.

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Also, the way I see it, the Government could have ignored the effects of feminism by imposing barriers. The ones destroying society are not one particular group; it's everybody. Who sowed the seeds of discontent (politics/unjust men)? Who sprouted the issue by initiating it (women)? Who continued it? What was the result? Is it still occurring? Like Germany in WWII, it wasn't really their fault they want to war, but partially ours; we made the Treaty of Versailles, who Hitler frequently referred to and how it was one of the reasons why he did what he did (presumably), but people still believe it was all of Germany's fault, which is clearly incorrect. Are we the sole cause of the war? Of course not. Even if it angered the big bad H, it could have been ignored, and at some point, something could have happened.

As for your quote, yeah, it's correct all right. But they need each other. If a women is not what she is supposed to be, which mind you is constructed by society.

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Lastly, not all feminists are "equal to men, becoming men, women superiority" seekers. In essence, it's supposed to be equal political rights (although affirmative action is BS) and general respect. It's not so black/white, because the term "feminism" has a different term for everyone... Unless you are defining a literary term, very few things have the same meaning to someone. Feminism should have just been equal political rights and general respect, but like a whole slew of other things, it's been corrupted with other wants or desires. The media in particular has successfully portrayed feminism to be a certain way that tells us it's a bad thing, and on the other hand it's portrayed the message that it is beneficial to society. Is it? Well, in terms of politics, it's reasonable to have a women's opinion on something lest it's not bias (strictly women POV) and reasonable. There's nothing wrong with that. On the other hand, women supremacists are not good... It all depends on the person.

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

You do realize that "women showing individuality" is also evident in males. Now that gender roles, while still part of a society, are being broken down as a whole. Men are becoming less masculine as well. It is becoming more and more frequent for men to behave outside of their gender role, while some men are even actual fathers. Of course, it is probably less focused on because "women are this/that/feminism", but it's there for sure. So when you say "women are destroying themselves", men are too, but at a slower rate. I suppose it's kind of because women feel the need to do more because they want to get noticed, and throughout Canadian history in particular did "boyish" things that got attention everywhere. Now that being boyish is not really rare, some do it, some don't... Sure, men won't dress in high heels and wear women's clothing, but will behave more femininely. Even before feminism, women were not considered "people" and were still objects...

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Con't.

mothers also are important. If one leaves (which is a seldom occurrence) than there is no mother figure. One is not more important than another, both are required in a family. That's what makes it a family, the parents, and the children. If one leaves the scene, something is missing. Typically, if the mother figure leaves, than that has bad effects. If the father leaves, that has consequences too. If they stay, they are getting two sides of the coin. One is not more important than another, they are both required, and anyone who says otherwise is wrong (which is unfortunate to think some people fail to realize). You have to have both, and your quote is right, but it shouldn't mean that a woman needs to be the way a woman is suggested to be by society, but a man should not have to be either. Because someone does not fit into their gender roles does not make them unethical or morally wrong people, in some cases it makes them more so (but it also goes both ways of course).

February 16, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

So being able to vote, work, and be considered people is asking for superiority? It's not. But now that they got what they asked for, they still seek more. What if it where the other way around? The same thing would happen. When people get what they ask, they ask for more. That's how everything goes. Some people cannot grasp that they have what they want; so they ask for more, and will never stop. All humans are like that; greedy. Asking for the ability to vote, being able to work, and be considered people is nothing wrong at all by any means, at all. Now you might say that's not the case; it was in Canada. However, now that it was given to them, people ask for more. Now some extremists want superiority because you know what, that's what we did to them, and that's their reason to justify. Is it logical? Of course it ISN'T.

<div class="ipsSpoiler_contents">nothing personal, but relating a special attacking machamp to feminism is not a very effective analogy.</div>

</div>

con't

February 15, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Con't:

I really do not support women becoming men, but that is how feminism is perceived nowadays. I can't really understand why because they want equal opportunities that "breaks the boundary". Women may typically motherly, but ultimately that is up to the individual. Men sometimes do not instill the child with messages and strength, which is "their sacred duty".

Actually, women aren't easily misled. Let me rephrase that; both types of people are easily misled. What makes one side more or less culpable? One side is easily submitted to greed and power which is the male, and the female typically is lost in emotions with little logic. Because of one's gender does not make them more or less capable to lead but the people themselves.

February 13, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

So, in essence, you haven't found that "ideal love" because they're not based on what their supposed to be? So if someone isn't the kitchen cooker, house cleaner or nurturing mother, then they are bad women? Or what if they are cleaners or in some cases, maidens, but don't nurture? Or what if they do nurture but don't clean? Men have to do some of those things too, they must raise the child, take care of their messes, and shouldn't expect it to always be done for them. However, the funny thing is that I don't like those that are mindless, insensitive, or sexist either, but I would much rather focus on the qualities as a person as opposed to what they should be. Feminism was meant to give women equal opportunities in voting, working, and a place of respect, because they weren't considered people. However, after they got those, they still needed something to complain about, and now feminism is seen as "being exactly the same as men" or "superior to men".

February 13, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Hopefully my sister has her sources... May ask her.

Nevertheless, the ideal of feminism isn't bad, but LIKE EVERYTHING HUMANITY HAS MADE HAS BEEN CORRUPTED. Equal rights was the intention, but now it's equal to reverse discrimination.

Abortion really depends on the situation...

I might scan a poster I made for my Media class that I might show you... If you're interested. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/unsure.png" alt=":/" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/unsure@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

February 13, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Not to sound like a douche, but here's a fun fact...

Women used to be considered superior to men. That is until the man figured out how children were made.

I say this because it sounds really ignorant when someone just says "women should stay in the kitchen." Oh, but does that mean that they should go around and be obnoxious troublemakers? NO.

The only reason I find abortion is reasonable is if there is no one capable of taking care of the child, if the parents are dirt poor or whatever, or if the mother will die if she gives birth, or something happens that is very extreme.

Saying "it's God's gift" just insults all mothers.

February 12, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Tell me how you react to this, primarily to what the candidate is saying.

Caution: Some language may be in here.

February 11, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Indeed... His semi-closing statement was "YOU don't suit Twisted Metal." I'm like, so I can't have different taste? I can't like Nintendo and something dark? So because I like something more cute/kid friendly that means I can't like it? Also this was going on because I stated that hip hop music after this jingle that plays should actually be metal, due to the dark nature of the game. So sad when people go arguing... But I watched a little bit of TF2 videos and now I'm past that point. The more I think about it... The more ridiculous I realized his statements were. "Oh, you actually went through my channel to see what I like in hopes you could be using that against me in an argument that is solely the matter of opinion? Perhaps you have nothing better to do in your life?" But yeah... I can't stand people like that. Living up to be "manly" or whatever, instead of having preferences for their own. If you live your life like how other people would want you, you'll never succeed.

February 5, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Will you be on the PO server today-ish?

And some people are really stupid... You know how some people will only like what is expected of them to like? For instance, I like Pokemon but also Twisted Metal (car combat dark thingimagig), well, someone was making fun of me because I said that this certain piece of music could fit after something else, then someone else said hip-hop could fit, I said "no, NO." Because it just didn't seem appropriate. Then he calls me a metal head, I say it just wouldn't make sense, he then goes through the time to look at my channel and then make fun of me because I like something so dark and then something Nintendo related, calling me "unmanly" and that I don't fit TM. I'm like... Dumbf-

General point is how some people will literally call me an idiot SIMPLY BECAUSE I like something. Isn't that so sad?

February 5, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

THAT.

WAS AWESOME. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/biggrin.png" alt=":D" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/biggrin@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

My brother's favourite steel/rock type is Aggron, I'll show him that. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/laugh.png" alt="xD" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/laugh@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

February 4, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

Indeed. I was never really a fan of sophitia, but nevertheless, when I saw her in 4, she was a lot more... Exposed...

EDIT: Woops, that was Cassandra I was thinking of...Fail.

*Looks at pic*

WHAT THE HECK? Let's throw all the dignity away from the character and just make her wear less. Happens way too often.

And that's why corporations and businesses control the government(s). *Ding!*

February 1, 2012

Lorshinator

wraith89

But when they were asked about what they learned in the book, one girl responded, "Uh well I never thought 'bout it" and another girl stated the obvious: "Love is blah, blah, blah". It's like, isn't romance usually about love? Ugh when I watched a review for the third film I was amazed at how utterly retarded it was. Sparkles? Abortion? What? WHAT?! Well, not only is the girl stereotypical as hell, but she us frustratingly stupid, sometimes attempting to commit suicide so that Edward can save her so she can get noticed. Hey, there's this less prettier guy who actually loves you, cares about you, and is willing to protect you, but BECAUSE HE'S NOT PRETTY ENOUGH, REJECTION. That's a good message isn't it?!

Well, sometimes there are messages in things, such as Wild Arms 5, which is about "overcoming your flaws" and "The environment" (You read right). The environment is obvious, but I find to make a stronger story the message needs to be more subtle.

Sorry for quadruple posting. <img src="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/sad.png" alt=":(" srcset="<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/sad@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

February 1, 2012

Sign In

Profiles

Pokédex

Portal

Technical Documentation

Pages

Tutorials

Forums

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Blogs

Everything posted by Lorshinator