FLOOTENKERP Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 Me too, but it's not anything to be perfected to fit another person's liking. If Game Freak liked it, they liked it.
Aarux Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 True. But if tons of people didn't like the name in Japan, do you think they'd change it in America?
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 True but I really would like to know who comes up with the names for this stuff especially for the pokemon. Aarux no I don't think they would because it is already widely known in the US
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 Well now that I think of it that's what they did with "The World Ends With You".
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 YAh sorry again but it was in relationship to the names and what would happen if they were unpopular, that was just an example. Still the names are not all bad.
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 That was a what if situation and they don't need to change them now that they have been announced.
FLOOTENKERP Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 They can dub the name. Green was dubbed to Blue, what does that tell you?
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 They could change it some thing less familiar like when they changed platinum orb to the other name.
FLOOTENKERP Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 The Griseous orb, and I don't think a dub will even be necessary.
bear831 Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 True we can hope, see the simple name change of a item has completely thrown me think of that in terms of a game title?
FLOOTENKERP Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 A game item is not nearly as important as a game title. Comparing them is pretty weird.
Aarux Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 Man, this thread has arguments of the weirdest things. An item wouldn't affect the game's title. Don't titles come before actually making the game?
FLOOTENKERP Posted June 4, 2009 Posted June 4, 2009 Yeah, what was wrong with Dusk Gold and Soul Silver? Those names were copyrighted, so I believe that Nintendo was not the ones who copyrighted them.
alpark94 Posted June 4, 2009 Posted June 4, 2009 I thought they were fair names A bit cheesy, but I don't really care that much I guess the heart and soul part of the names came from the trio "heat soul and mind"
Aarux Posted June 5, 2009 Posted June 5, 2009 I thought they were fair namesA bit cheesy, but I don't really care that much I guess the heart and soul part of the names came from the trio "heat soul and mind" Heart, Soul, and Mind... hmmm... If that's what they're going by, then Crystal will be called "Mind Crystal." ... that doesn't sound right, though.
FLOOTENKERP Posted June 5, 2009 Posted June 5, 2009 There isn't going to be a Crystal remake. But I don't see what is wrong with these names. They seem fine.
Aarux Posted June 5, 2009 Posted June 5, 2009 They usually make games in trios... I don't see why not. The names are just so... cheesy. To me, anyway. If it was something like FireRed or LeafGreen, then maybe I'd like it.
FLOOTENKERP Posted June 5, 2009 Posted June 5, 2009 Fire Red and Leaf Green had no third. If that is not enough proof, there is no data for Crystal in a save file of DPPT. I don't think the names are cheesy at all. They sound fine, they just could be better.
Aarux Posted June 5, 2009 Posted June 5, 2009 We don't know yet if they'll have one or not. But the pattern's like this... Red, Blue, Green. Gold, Silver, Crystal. Ruby, Sapphire, Emerald. Pearl, Diamond, Platinum. It seems reasonable to me. By FR/LG, I meant the names. FireRed, LeafGreen. Something similar to that would be nice... in my opinion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now