TheMantyke

I think this has more to do with the movepool Pokecheck sites more than anything, but for some reason, my Mudkip is being deemed hacked for knowing the tutor attack Earth Power. The strangest thing is that my Mudkip was able to learn the attack like any other tutor attack, yet no movepool I've come across lists it as a learnable tutor attack. For the record, this Mudkip was the same Mudkip received from Steven and RNG manipulated on an emulator. The Mudkip was traded to a cartridge HGSS game using a flash cart and tutored there. Mudkip link: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=675750

Sorry to post twice in such quick succession, but I have a problem with my Latios. The legality checker is deeming my spread hacked, even though it was just a simple RNG capture. RNG Reporter correctly told me the PID of my Latios would be 6937DA48 (1765268040 in decimal which the legality analysis displays), but the legality analysis is deeming it hacked. Also please note that this was not a Cute Charm abuse. There wasn't even a synchronizer involved. Link to the Latios: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=652508

I have a problem with my Clefable. Encore can be passed down to a Cleffa if both parents know the attack and it's showing as a hacked attack on my level 2 Clefable. Link: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=630417

This is a very minor concern, but occasionally genderless Pokemon will be listed as potential chain breed parents. My Kabuto has Staryu and Starmie listed as potential parents for the combination of Bubblebeam and Rapid Spin. The Kabuto: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=422280

That flag is just a warning that the IVs of the Pokemon are abnormally high. This usually means that the Pokemon was either an RNG manipulated Pokemon or was editted. In your first example, your Zoroark's IVs were very high with only a sinlge stat under 30. In your other examples, they all had mediocre IVs. You have absolutely nothing to fear, traditional breeds with fantastic IVs often set off this flag as well.

Over the course of the last few days, I've found a few false positives using Pokecheck. 1) Keldeo, Meloetta, and Genesect aren't immediately deemed hacked. This Genesect for example passes the legality test despite obviously being illegal. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=408680 2) Zorua and Zoroark sometimes come up as hacked if shiny, even if they're not from the ingame event. This Zorua and Zoroark, both the same Pokemon, are coming up as illegal even though they were bred. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=419076 3) Evolved Pokemon from Gen 4 onwards are not immediately disqualified as hacked. This Haxorus which the creator has admitted to have created is coming up a legal even though it's in an egg. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=431177 On a final minor note, have you ever considered changing the "Invalid egg recieve date" to a more specific "Recieve date is in the future" message? I've noticed that the current message is sort of vague and confusing to new users.

I think I've found a small problem. My Munchlax has the egg move combo of Self Destruct + Curse. Pokecheck is detecting the combo as illegal, but it should be possible to obtain with a 3rd Generation Snorlax parent with Curse bred onto it and Self Destruct tutored. Link to the Munchlax: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=299437