dcrispell7

If I am not mistaken, the stationary Jellicent in Undella Bay in B/W2 that comes with it's HA is shiny locked. As such, https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=7720590 is illegal.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=7161469 Hidden Grotto pokemon need to have their HA, anything caught in a HG without its HA is hacked.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=432920 https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2149431 Ice Burn on Giratina is showing up as legal.

Just reporting an old problem because I realized something new: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3479053 There is an issue with the encounter slot recognition on Safari Zone pokemon, but, when they evolve: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3479054 the problem goes away and the LA has no issues finding a possible encounter.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5230273 Type 1 PID on a WISHMKR Jirachi is not legal. EDIT: I cannot tell if that Jirachi was deleted or made private, so just in case, here is another link with the same issue https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=5152181 Hopefully that one stays up.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=4758392 An example of the issue Hozu is referring too.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=4921668 Gen 4 Rayquaza with a gen 5 format name, but not nicknamed. It is "Rayquaza" when it should be "RAYQUAZA". EDIT: According to a PM conversation I had in the shoutbox, the pokemon were uploaded from a gen 5 game after being poketransferred and when the gen 5 GTS filter kicked in to censor the OT, it changed the pokemon's name to lowercase without marking it as nicknamed. I have no clue if that is how it works, but I figured I would mention it so those who actually know how things work can determine if it really is something that needs to be fixed, or if I'm just ignorant

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=4095294 Helping Hand is showing up as hacked for gen 4 Poliwag even though it is a valid move tutor in HG/SS (and probably Plaitnum too, but I didn't check on that version so I don't know which tutors are HG/SS exclusive). Upon transfer to gen 5 the move shows up just fine, however.

Dream Radar Giratina-O (uploaded via GTS) shows the ability as hacked: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3702100 For comparison, the same Giratina uploaded without the orb shows up just fine: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2864702

http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3485147 Tailwind shows up as hacked for Vibrava (interestingly enough, it registers fine for flygon http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3485165)

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3478124 ► Locations Possible method J/K slots don't match encounter. Riolu appeared on slot 5 for me based on the number of blocks I had and the fact that they leveled up. Given the fact that a person can manipulate the blocks in the SZ a person can pretty much put the pokemon on any slot they want (granted, it may take a few months to let the blocks level up enough to drag out other pokemon, but it is still possible). Interestingly enough, another pokemon that only appears with the blocks, Beldum http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3468924 shows up just fine. EDIT: http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3479053 The LA doesn't seem to like Bagon either.

False Positive: http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3081795 Magnet Rise shows up as hacked/Event only when it is a valid HG/SS move tutor

False Positive: Gen 5 format Safari Zone pokemon show up as being in a hacked ball http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847514 despite the location recognizing it as a Safari zone pokemon. For comparison, here is the same Ditto in gen 4 format http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847510 (not sure if this helps any, but just in case) On a related note, only Great Marsh pokemon seem to have a Safari Zone/Great Marsh encounter type (as seen here http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2356967) whereas HG/SS Safari Zone pokemon are labeled as a Tall Grass encounter type, like the Ditto.

I couldn't remember why I had a random Oshawott on my account so I deleted it only to remember i had linked it here Sorry for the repost. Any way, the LA doesn't recognize 65535 as a valid TID in gen 5 http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2554936 even though it recognizes 65535 as a valid SID http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2402744 and has no issues with 65535 as a TID in gen 3 (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=610175) and gen 4 (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1888603)

whoops, sorry about the typo