Jump to content
xfr

Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

Recommended Posts

Ok so I am here again with something I feel is important.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920263 : My EMU RNG'd Beldum from my Ruby save (no RAM Hacks)

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920234 : My EMU RNG'd Groudon from my Ruby save (no RAM Hacks)

Both of these Pokemon show Invalid Pal Park Trash Bytes. However, these four don't:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920244

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920241

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920237

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920230

All were RNG'd on VBA-RR without Ram Hacks and Pal Parked using DeSmuMe.

As I recall, I was told that Pokecheck does not support EMU Pal Park Trash Bytes, but then, why do these four have Valid Pal Park Trash Bytes.

Something to note, I Pal Parked them in the same batch.

Now, I'll try nicknaming the Pokemon(s) (Groudon and Beldum) and Pal Park them again.

EDIT: Here are the two Pokemon in question:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920624

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2920615

It can be seen that Pal Parking them again in a different order witha different pokemon gave me different Trash Bytes.

Beldum got fixed, but Groudon still gets Invalid Trash Bytes after Pal Parking.

Next, I'll send them again but in a different order.

Edited by DemonStrike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Pal Parked using DeSmuMe.

There's your problem. We don't support it because they are so wildly variant... we just support Retail resultant trash bytes (and a few emulator ones); just run them through trashbytes.exe if you want to fix them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647

false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball)

*i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun

falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball)

*ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal

Edited by heavy_metal
post in spanish cuz im not speak good english xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
https://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=92647

false positive, wrong name of pokeball (says dream ball but, the ball its park ball)

*i know its a hax pokemon i was download some moltres with morning sun

falso positivo, incorrecto nombre de pokeball (dice que es sueño ball pero la pokebola es parque ball)

*ya se que es un hax pokemon solo buscaba descargar algun moltres con sol matinal

No, just no. There is nothing wrong with the Legality Analysis in this case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LA does not seem to like eggs traded from D/P to HG/SS. http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

That's funny; I was just about to report that. I never would've noticed this if I didn't have those pokemon accidentally not private. I just clicked them randomly trying to figure out why I had a Marstomp thinking that was my B2, but my SS had the same name. I only uploaded these guys to see who had random 31's, and never thought to check the legality analysis.

More technical information:

When starting my JP SS long before the English release, I sent myself some eggs from my English Pearl. When going through my other pokemon from my English Pearl, I noticed it does the same thing with pokemon traded from my JP Diamiond to the English Pearl before they hatched.

Going to list all the trainer information just in case it helps, but I am beginning to believe the origin trainer of the egg sets the location of the OTs game, even if it is different.

Pokemon from English Pearl with her OT:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604921 (Not sure why this one is missing some trashbytes, it was hatched on my retail copy)

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604919

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604932 (Also missing hatch trashbytes?)

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1604917 (Same as above.)

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1537738

Eggs that originated on my JP Diamond that hatched on English Pearl: Not a false positive, but displays wrong game for the OT, matching the origin game.

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713666

Pokemon from JP Diamond:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1708824

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1713672

Pokemon from JP SS:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949348

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949332

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949322

Pokemon that originated in my ENG Pearl, but hatched on JP SS: False Positives

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949223

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949224

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949298

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949294

Other False positives:

My surfing Raichu who was caught as a pikachu on the pokewalker on JP SS: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949225

Flail Pikachu from same pokewalker course: https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1949273

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816

False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!)

Edit:

5 new borns. Breed on W1 and then hatched on W2, all saying are from the WC #29: A Secret Egg!

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021889

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021890

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021892

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021894

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3021895

Edited by Aleph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Newly contributed Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona has not been updated yet.

My two eggs from Kanto Starter Egg event, Charmander (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010271) and Bulbasaur (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010273) is showed up as "Met location does not match wondercard". This Bulbasaur is hatched at Virbank City, while Charmander is hatched at Floccesy Town.

My other egg, Squirtle (http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2010272), does not have any problem.

E: Korean WCS Shiny Volcarona was updated.

Edited by RainThunder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2903816

False positive(Negative maybe?). A RNG'd egg from W1 and then traded to W2 says is from a Wonder Card (WC #29: A Secret Egg!)

This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change)

This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363

note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition

In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version):

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This pokemon is valid because when you trade an egg the game changes the OT, tid, sid and game (country not change)

This pokemon is hacks because the nature, gender or iv's speed is not same of the wonder card. You see this axew and compare with the others:

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3031363

note: this axew obtained in english edition and before hatch I traded into a black 2 spanish edition

In this link you can see it's the same (in this case is a squirtle egg event traded into white spanish version):

https://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=3020837

You're a rather poor script kiddie if you can't even figure legality out. The issue is that a NON-EVENT Axew egg is being incorrectly flagged as the event.

http://www.pokecheck.org/?pk=3042177

Mew is not a valid Entralink Pokémon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

False Positive:

Gen 5 format Safari Zone pokemon show up as being in a hacked ball http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847514 despite the location recognizing it as a Safari zone pokemon.

For comparison, here is the same Ditto in gen 4 format http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2847510 (not sure if this helps any, but just in case)

On a related note, only Great Marsh pokemon seem to have a Safari Zone/Great Marsh encounter type (as seen here http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=2356967) whereas HG/SS Safari Zone pokemon are labeled as a Tall Grass encounter type, like the Ditto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a false positive on my Kingdra

I'm not surprised that the IVs came up as likely hacked (I am so proud of these guy being able to fool a legality checker into thinking he's fake). However, I AM surprised about this:

Nickname Neptune\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\xFFFF

All characters in name are valid.

This Pokémon is missing DPPt hatch trash bytes.

The heck is going on here?

EDIT: Link to the legality check screenshot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...