Jump to content

Odaxis

Member
  • Posts

    192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

16 Good

About Odaxis

  • Birthday 11/09/1981

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Odaxis

    Batch Editor

    This allowed me to see where the errors were. Gender values were off which caused the error. a followup batch edit with the correct values for OT and HT (in this case 0 instead of 2) corrected the problem Not sure if it's possible but is there any way you can configure the batch editor to run a check for illegal values or is that not something that could be coded
  2. Odaxis

    Batch Editor

    this is what i see post batch edits all are illegal until i run the check, then i have to "set" each of them
  3. Odaxis

    Batch Editor

    Hey there. I just recently sat down to learn how to USE PKHeX's Batch Editor. I have 728 PK files to edit with it. All legal prior to editing. I'm editing in New trainer details and making sure all the files match the Ultra Moon OT data. After editing, all the files now show Illegal until they have the legality check ran then they show as legal. I spoke with Sabresite and he said it was some form of deferred legality check Is there any way to avoid this check? The whole reason for me to use the batch editor is to make simple legal changes The string I'm using
  4. Ok. Lets say for the sake of this experiment. It's a wild Pokemon. Caught at level 12 in Mt. Moon. Not a bred Pokemon. All moves are TM/Level Up or Tutor moves. It's a Wild Pokemon. I'm still getting the legality test showing encounter as cleffa egg and it's still showing as legal. Clefable.rar
  5. Sorry, Still a little confused about the PID nature/IV mismatch thing. If RNGReporter tells me there are 0 PID combinations that can result from a Bold / 6IV spread (using the IV's to PID tool) Shouldn't any variation of that species with a Bold nature and 31/31/31/31/31/31 spread generate a PID/Nature mismatch?
  6. Is it possible to Gen a Bold Perfect IV Clefairy in gen 3 (Ruby) Need it to have "Soft-Boiled" which is gen 3 only. According to RNGReporter there are no PIDs that would result from a bold 6 iv spread. PKHeX (current build as of this post) says it legal. Not sure what to trust. I opened this thread but didn't understand the meaning behind his response. https://github.com/kwsch/PKHeX/issues/1342
  7. Odaxis

    PGF Bug

    I did and they did. thanks for the heads up coolbeans
  8. Odaxis

    PGF Bug

    I somehow got flagged with Github after opening an issue. Not sure if you can see it or not. It seems like some event files like "032 Movie 2011 Victini ENG [PPorg].pgf" are being added with the trainers info (TID/SID/OT) instead of the event info making them illegal. Not sure if this is an issue with the pgf files or PKHeX.
  9. Are the PokeWalker Pokémon, like the Self-Destruct Munchlax, transferred from the PokeWalker to Gen 4 games tested for Legality? https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/List_of_Pokémon_found_through_the_Pokéwalker
  10. Because its an early release Pokemon. It's scheduled to be officially released on Jul 15th. Should trade fine after that.
  11. Odaxis

    Jirachi

    Understood, Thanks.
  12. Odaxis

    Jirachi

    Heya. Another question. Why does the WISHMAKR Jirachi show this error in the latest commits? Is it safe to assume, as this file came from this sites events download page, that it's just PKHeX and not actually Illegal?
  13. Odaxis

    Possible issue

    Gotcha. I understand. Thanks for the detailed explanation. If possible. Might i suggest you add a little more detail to the error stating as much. "unable to match encounter conditions to a possible RNG frame" may be a little confusing for the traditional PKHeX user (like myself) Thanks again.
  14. Odaxis

    Possible issue

    I see, So is there no way for PKHeX to play middle man in this. Lets say I wanted an X D Articuno and I wanted to make it Calm nature with no other changes. PKHeX flags it as illegal but it's supposed to have a random nature on capture according to what i see online. I assumed re rolling the PID would have given it its valid PIDIV but it still shows illegal. May I also have a link to this legality report?
×
×
  • Create New...