Originally Posted by SCV
Nevermind. I was misunderstood three times now. >_>Originally Posted by randomspot555
Sabresite: Sorry I deleted your signature pic on accident,.
Greencat, I'll try to break down my understanding of your posts so you can be more clear.
Agreed.
I think this is what threw me off. Overpowered is probably our new name for Ubers. The hypothetical tier between OU and Ubers (which hadn't been named) was for pokemon that were very centralizing in the OU metagame. It had nothing to do with Ubers. It was essentially a banlist for OU. Most of the pokemon I mentioned were quite centralizing in the OU metagame, so banning atleast some of them would make sense for a new player. However, I opposed the idea because experienced players wouldn't like it and it would create disorder.
Wobbuffet and Garchomp were moved to Ubers not because it was predicted they would function well. In fact, if you read up on the Garchomp suspect, there was a massive opposition that Garchomp would become useless in Ubers. Well, he hasn't. The point of moving Wobbuffet and Garchomp was because they broke the Standard metagame and overcentralised it. Smogon could potentially move any pokemon up to Ubers, so long as it breaks the OU metagame, regardless how it would function in its new tier.
Ubers wasn't created to be a metagame. Its a banlist.
OK, it seems we are coming to a conclusion as to how many tiers we want.
Now we should discuss a testing method.
Tests should probably start once we have analyzed once we know what the new available movesets are after HG/SS is released. So we can use the remaining days to decide on a method, as well as names (there is already another thread the names).
The guys who have been testing, if you can post your method so we can see if that's what we want to use or modify. The testing you guys have done might not be applicable now (maybe it will be) but at least we can learn from the method.
This is dead for now, anyway, tiering will be shaken up in September. Closing
aRyuujin on LoL NA
aRyuujin.546 on SCII NA
Bookmarks