Closed Thread
Page 5 of 5
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: Development of a PP Tier

  1. #61
    The Green Cat Helpful Q&A MemberSite ContributorImage ContributorContributor - ForumFormer Staff Greencat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    California, US
    Posts
    711

    Re: Development of a PP Tier

    Quote Originally Posted by SCV
    The point of Wobbuffet and Garchomp being put in Ubers is that they don't work well in OU.
    Quote Originally Posted by randomspot555
    Exactly. People should keep in mind that the uber tier is not meant to be balanced. It's just a ban list for the standard tier. A Pokemon that doesn't perform well in ubers means jack if it should be there. It should be there if it centralizes the standard tier.
    Nevermind. I was misunderstood three times now. >_>
    Sabresite: Sorry I deleted your signature pic on accident, .

  2. #62
    Alchemist Team RaterSite Contributor Illithian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Age
    20
    Posts
    464

    Re: Development of a PP Tier

    Greencat, I'll try to break down my understanding of your posts so you can be more clear.

    Quote Originally Posted by Greencat View Post
    Illithian, many of the Pokemon you mentioned in your list couldn't work in Ubers.
    Agreed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Greencat View Post
    Why use Porygon-Z when Rayquaza or Lyogre does the job much much better? The class above HIgh Class, Overpowerd, is for Pokemon that can operate well in both OU and Ubers.
    I think this is what threw me off. Overpowered is probably our new name for Ubers. The hypothetical tier between OU and Ubers (which hadn't been named) was for pokemon that were very centralizing in the OU metagame. It had nothing to do with Ubers. It was essentially a banlist for OU. Most of the pokemon I mentioned were quite centralizing in the OU metagame, so banning atleast some of them would make sense for a new player. However, I opposed the idea because experienced players wouldn't like it and it would create disorder.

    Quote Originally Posted by Greencat View Post
    You misunderstood again. I was also discussing the potential for a tier between OU and Ubers, except that it should be Pokémon that can operate well in both OU and Ubers, like Woubuffet and Garchomp.
    Wobbuffet and Garchomp were moved to Ubers not because it was predicted they would function well. In fact, if you read up on the Garchomp suspect, there was a massive opposition that Garchomp would become useless in Ubers. Well, he hasn't. The point of moving Wobbuffet and Garchomp was because they broke the Standard metagame and overcentralised it. Smogon could potentially move any pokemon up to Ubers, so long as it breaks the OU metagame, regardless how it would function in its new tier.

    Ubers wasn't created to be a metagame. Its a banlist.

  3. #63
    4th Gen Game Researcher DeveloperGame Save ResearcherROM ResearcherRAM ResearcherIRC OwnerAdministrator SCV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Mexico D.F.
    Age
    26
    Posts
    459

    Re: Development of a PP Tier

    OK, it seems we are coming to a conclusion as to how many tiers we want.

    Now we should discuss a testing method.

    Tests should probably start once we have analyzed once we know what the new available movesets are after HG/SS is released. So we can use the remaining days to decide on a method, as well as names (there is already another thread the names).

    The guys who have been testing, if you can post your method so we can see if that's what we want to use or modify. The testing you guys have done might not be applicable now (maybe it will be) but at least we can learn from the method.

  4. #64
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    253

    Re: Development of a PP Tier

    This is dead for now, anyway, tiering will be shaken up in September. Closing
    aRyuujin on LoL NA
    aRyuujin.546 on SCII NA

Closed Thread
Page 5 of 5
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
PPN Top 50