Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

[Vicjor]

that will make hack?
http://www.pokecheck.org/?screenshot=946675&la


According to Project Pokémon. bulbapedia has correct data

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wi...ley%27s_trades

http://projectpokemon.org/events/jp-mpr.php


regards

[RainThunder]

1. This Pokemon should not considered to be legal: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=906648
2. Pokemon Box exclusive move still "hacked":
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947772
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947771
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947770
3. My Tyranitar is not from Colosseum/XD, but its Dragon Dance still being reported as "Colosseum/XD exclusive"
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=877738

[randomspot555]

#2: It says "Hacked/event only".

[TyphX]

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=926224

Burnt Tower is where Suicune reappears after being revived by defeating the E4 if fainted in Kanto.

[Localhorst]

GBA Unowns are always registered as hacked because og a "Unknown GBA PID" (if you change the colour to green and remove the "k" it is fine

[Vicjor]

thanks for correcting the data of Metagross

http://www.pokecheck.org/?screenshot=959729&la

[Dark Ray]

Signed up to report some problems with the 4th gen legality checker.

Both these Pokemon are private, if this is a problem I can post screenshots.

Scyther. This was caught during a chain (I had to start a chain because of the lack of correct encounter slots), but it says "Possible method J/K slots don't match encounter." Since starting a chain overwrites encounter slots any chainable Pokemon (any Pokemon from DPPt found in grass) has no invalid spread/slot combos.

Above Scyther now a Scizor. Same Pokemon as above, now evolved into a Scizor, this time it says "Static / Magnet Pull encounter.", the only problem is that Scizor has never been catchable and Scyther is not affected by Static/Magnet Pull.

EDIT: Another Pokemon, Shinx. This is a chained shiny with a Static lead but it shows "Unknown encounter.", it's like this for all the shiny Shinx I caught from the same chain.

[jediscott]

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=973475
Transferred this over from SoulSilver the other day, have used it a few times fro breeding and it shows ExtremeSpeed as hacked... I know that this is the one I received from the old man in the cave though.

[Agonist]

it says (hacked/event only)

[Jaguar]

Sorry about my English. I'm not English use, so my English's grammer might be wrong.

I checked my pokémon to test pokémon's trashbyte of nickname. I named my Shuppet 'オ' in my Pokémon Emerald(Japanece Language) and I used Pal Park in HG(Korean).
Shuppet's data is appeared, checked trashbyte.

オ\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\x4200\x0000\x0000\x0000\x801C\ x0D02\xE0FF
All characters in name are valid.
Invalid Pal Park trash bytes.

Why do you think the message is appeared?



I checked my Pokémon's Pokérus too. And, it's data is appeared wrong either.
I sended my Scizor to the Pokécheck, checked the Legality Analysis.

Pokérus

Default strain (might be from hacked pokérus).

I didn't use edit or hack. And the pokérus from another pokémon infected my Scizor. It is gaved for me by another person. Why is it appeared?

[Localhorst]

Pokemon caught in HGSS Safari Zone are false positives, "Unknown Encounter". I guess it is because their Encounter Type is Tall Grass/Darkrai and not "Safari Zone/Great Marsh".
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=985534
Just caught that 100% legit Rhyhorn to control that.

another bugreport: http://www.pokecheck.org/?screenshot=985504&la
Encounter Type is correct and you can catch Yanma up to lvl 31 in the Great Marsh.

[Localhorst]

Not 100% sure if this is a false positive, but I think so.
Legal.exe says this http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=991932 is Rare GBA (A-B-D-F) Type, Pokecheck reports an Unknown GBA Type (=Hack).
In case I'm wrong and it actually IS a Hack, please send me a PM.

[Dark Ray]

Back again.

This Tentacool used to show up as "Valid (cute charm on ESV=whatever)." but now shows "Hacked (valid spreads: 5/8/18/6/19/24, 10/9/8/27/18/8, ).", it's the only Cute Charm Mon I have that shows up as having an invalid IV/PID combo. EDIT: Found 2 more, Caterpie 1, Caterpie 2.
The Location also shows invalid slots.

This Grimer has the same encounter slot problem which leads me to believe it's a problem with surfing CC encounter slots. Edit: Zubat with invalid slots, now I'm lost.

[xfr]

I'm changing it at the moment which is why you'll see weird results for a while

[EXEC_HARMONIOUS/.]

Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but certain PCNY events are coming up as "Unknown GBA PID".

http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=741400
http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=10643

I'm not sure if the Seviper is a legit PCNY Pokemon in the first place, but the Machamp definitely is; I got it at the Gotta Catch 'Em All Station in 2004. Unfortunately, all I have is my word that it's a real PCNY event, since it's not in any event database.

Also, what about the legality checker also telling if a Pokemon can legitimately be a certain level? For example, I edited this otherwise legitimate Typhlosion to have an impossible level, but the legality checker still claims the level to be valid.
Original: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1020152
Edited level: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1033190