Page 25 of 76 FirstFirst ... 152122232425262728293575 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 1137

Thread: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

  1. #361

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5


  2. #362

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    1. This Pokemon should not considered to be legal: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=906648
    2. Pokemon Box exclusive move still "hacked":
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947772
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947771
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=947770
    3. My Tyranitar is not from Colosseum/XD, but its Dragon Dance still being reported as "Colosseum/XD exclusive"
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=877738

  3. #363

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    #2: It says "Hacked/event only".

  4. #364

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=926224

    Burnt Tower is where Suicune reappears after being revived by defeating the E4 if fainted in Kanto.

  5. #365

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    GBA Unowns are always registered as hacked because og a "Unknown GBA PID" (if you change the colour to green and remove the "k" it is fine

  6. #366

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    thanks for correcting the data of Metagross

    http://www.pokecheck.org/?screenshot=959729&la

  7. #367

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Signed up to report some problems with the 4th gen legality checker.

    Both these Pokemon are private, if this is a problem I can post screenshots.

    Scyther. This was caught during a chain (I had to start a chain because of the lack of correct encounter slots), but it says "Possible method J/K slots don't match encounter." Since starting a chain overwrites encounter slots any chainable Pokemon (any Pokemon from DPPt found in grass) has no invalid spread/slot combos.

    Above Scyther now a Scizor. Same Pokemon as above, now evolved into a Scizor, this time it says "Static / Magnet Pull encounter.", the only problem is that Scizor has never been catchable and Scyther is not affected by Static/Magnet Pull.

    EDIT: Another Pokemon, Shinx. This is a chained shiny with a Static lead but it shows "Unknown encounter.", it's like this for all the shiny Shinx I caught from the same chain.
    Last edited by Dark Ray; Mar 14th, 2012 at 08:47 PM.

  8. #368

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=973475
    Transferred this over from SoulSilver the other day, have used it a few times fro breeding and it shows ExtremeSpeed as hacked... I know that this is the one I received from the old man in the cave though.

  9. #369

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    it says (hacked/event only)

  10. #370

    Question Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Sorry about my English. I'm not English use, so my English's grammer might be wrong.

    I checked my pokémon to test pokémon's trashbyte of nickname. I named my Shuppet 'オ' in my Pokémon Emerald(Japanece Language) and I used Pal Park in HG(Korean).
    Shuppet's data is appeared, checked trashbyte.

    オ\xFFFF\x0000\x0000\x4200\x0000\x0000\x0000\x801C\ x0D02\xE0FF
    All characters in name are valid.
    Invalid Pal Park trash bytes.

    Why do you think the message is appeared?



    I checked my Pokémon's Pokérus too. And, it's data is appeared wrong either.
    I sended my Scizor to the Pokécheck, checked the Legality Analysis.

    Pokérus

    Default strain (might be from hacked pokérus).

    I didn't use edit or hack. And the pokérus from another pokémon infected my Scizor. It is gaved for me by another person. Why is it appeared?

  11. #371

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Pokemon caught in HGSS Safari Zone are false positives, "Unknown Encounter". I guess it is because their Encounter Type is Tall Grass/Darkrai and not "Safari Zone/Great Marsh".
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=985534
    Just caught that 100% legit Rhyhorn to control that.

    another bugreport: http://www.pokecheck.org/?screenshot=985504&la
    Encounter Type is correct and you can catch Yanma up to lvl 31 in the Great Marsh.

  12. #372

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Not 100% sure if this is a false positive, but I think so.
    Legal.exe says this http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=991932 is Rare GBA (A-B-D-F) Type, Pokecheck reports an Unknown GBA Type (=Hack).
    In case I'm wrong and it actually IS a Hack, please send me a PM.

  13. #373

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Back again.

    This Tentacool used to show up as "Valid (cute charm on ESV=whatever)." but now shows "Hacked (valid spreads: 5/8/18/6/19/24, 10/9/8/27/18/8, ).", it's the only Cute Charm Mon I have that shows up as having an invalid IV/PID combo. EDIT: Found 2 more, Caterpie 1, Caterpie 2.
    The Location also shows invalid slots.

    This Grimer has the same encounter slot problem which leads me to believe it's a problem with surfing CC encounter slots. Edit: Zubat with invalid slots, now I'm lost.

  14. #374

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    I'm changing it at the moment which is why you'll see weird results for a while
    Pokécheck - A GTS to let you deposit and receive pokemon, view their stats, import and export to .pkm and more - gen 4 and 5 supported
    Pokémon Black/White animated sprites, now with back sprites, alternate/female forms and all shiny versions thereof.

  15. #375

    Re: Beta: the pokécheck legality checker for generation 5

    Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but certain PCNY events are coming up as "Unknown GBA PID".

    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=741400
    http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=10643

    I'm not sure if the Seviper is a legit PCNY Pokemon in the first place, but the Machamp definitely is; I got it at the Gotta Catch 'Em All Station in 2004. Unfortunately, all I have is my word that it's a real PCNY event, since it's not in any event database.

    Also, what about the legality checker also telling if a Pokemon can legitimately be a certain level? For example, I edited this otherwise legitimate Typhlosion to have an impossible level, but the legality checker still claims the level to be valid.
    Original: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1020152
    Edited level: http://www.pokecheck.org/?p=detail&uid=1033190

Page 25 of 76 FirstFirst ... 152122232425262728293575 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •